
FirePro V7000

Radeon R7 360
FirePro V7000 vs Radeon R7 360 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V7000 vs Radeon R7 360 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V7000 vs Radeon R7 360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V7000
2012Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌724.8% HIGHER MSRP$899 MSRPvs$109 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.5 vs 28.6 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 80W.
- ❌46.7% longer card at 242mm vs 165mm.
Radeon R7 360
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $790 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 712.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.6 vs 3.5 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 150W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 165mm instead of 242mm, a 77mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V7000 vs Radeon R7 360 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V7000
The FirePro V7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points. Launch price was $1,249.

Radeon R7 360
The Radeon R7 360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,116 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V7000 scores 3,162 and the Radeon R7 360 reaches 3,116 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V7000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 360 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V7000) vs 768 (Radeon R7 360). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro V7000) vs 1.613 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 360).
| Feature | FirePro V7000 | Radeon R7 360 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,162+1% | 3,116 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+67% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.432 TFLOPS+51% | 1.613 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+67% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+67% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V7000 | Radeon R7 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V7000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 360 carries 2 GB. FirePro V7000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V7000 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 360. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro V7000) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 360) — the FirePro V7000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V7000 | Radeon R7 360 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro V7000) vs 12 (Radeon R7 360). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro V7000 | Radeon R7 360 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro V7000) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 360). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V7000) vs H.264 (Radeon R7 360).
| Feature | FirePro V7000 | Radeon R7 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V7000 draws 150W versus the Radeon R7 360's 80W — a 60.9% difference. The Radeon R7 360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V7000) vs 450W (Radeon R7 360). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 165mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FirePro V7000 | Radeon R7 360 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 80W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 165mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 21.1 | 39.0+85% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V7000 came in at $899, while the Radeon R7 360 launched at $109. On MSRP, Radeon R7 360 was 87.9% cheaper ($790 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.5 (FirePro V7000) vs 28.6 (Radeon R7 360) — the Radeon R7 360 offers 717.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 360 (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro V7000 | Radeon R7 360 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899 | $109-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.5 | 28.6+717% |
| Codename | Pitcairn | Tobago |
| Release | August 27 2012 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #462 | #576 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














