FirePro V7000 vs Radeon 660M

FirePro V7000

2012Core: 950 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon 660M

2023Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 1900 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro V7000 vs Radeon 660M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V7000 vs Radeon 660M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V7000

2012

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 275% higher power demand at 150W vs 40W.

Radeon 660M

2023

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 40W instead of 150W, a 110W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $899 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon 660M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (3,221 vs 3,162), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 660M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2012. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V7000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, FirePro V7000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 660M has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro V7000 vs Radeon 660M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro V7000

The FirePro V7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points. Launch price was $1,249.

AMD

Radeon 660M

The Radeon 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,221 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V7000 scores 3,162 and the Radeon 660M reaches 3,221 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V7000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon 660M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V7000) vs 384 (Radeon 660M). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro V7000) vs 1.459 TFLOPS (Radeon 660M).

FeatureFirePro V7000Radeon 660M
G3D Mark Score
3,162
3,221+2%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
1280+233%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.432 TFLOPS+67%
1.459 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
80+233%
24
L1 Cache
320 KB+150%
128 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro V7000Radeon 660M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V7000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 660M carries 2 GB. FirePro V7000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V7000 and System on the Radeon 660M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro V7000) vs 2 MB (Radeon 660M) — the Radeon 660M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro V7000Radeon 660M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V7000 draws 150W versus the Radeon 660M's 40W — a 115.8% difference. The Radeon 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V7000) vs 350W (Radeon 660M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureFirePro V7000Radeon 660M
TDP
150W
40W-73%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
242mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
21.1
80.5+282%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 660M (2023 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro V7000Radeon 660M
MSRP
$899
Codename
Pitcairn
Rembrandt+
Release
August 27 2012
January 3 2023
Ranking
#462
#565

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.