
Radeon 740M vs Radeon Pro 455

Radeon 740M
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 455
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon 740M is positioned at rank #337 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 740M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 740M is significantly newer (2024 vs 2016). The Radeon 740M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro 455 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 455 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 740M.
| Insight | Radeon 740M | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro 455 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 740M and Radeon Pro 455

Radeon 740M
The Radeon 740M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 4 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,045 points.

Radeon Pro 455
The Radeon Pro 455 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 855 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,113 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 740M scores 3,045 and the Radeon Pro 455 reaches 3,113 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 740M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon Pro 455 uses GCN 4.0, both on 4 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 256 (Radeon 740M) vs 768 (Radeon Pro 455). Raw compute: 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon 740M) vs 1.313 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 455).
| Feature | Radeon 740M | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,045 | 3,113+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 768+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.867 TFLOPS+118% | 1.313 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 16 | 48+200% |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 192 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 740M | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 740M) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 455) — the Radeon 740M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 740M | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 740M draws 45W versus the Radeon Pro 455's 35W — a 25% difference. The Radeon Pro 455 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 740M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 455). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon 740M | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W | 35W-22% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 67.7 | 88.9+31% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 740M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon 740M | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $40 |
| Codename | Phoenix2 | Baffin |
| Release | January 31 2024 | October 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #581 | #577 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















