Radeon 740M
VS
Radeon Pro 455

Radeon 740M vs Radeon Pro 455

AMD

Radeon 740M

2024Core: 800 MHzBoost: 2800 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 455

2016Core: 855 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon 740M is positioned at rank #337 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 740M

#327
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
891%
#329
808%
#330
806%
#334
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
733%
#335
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
728%
#337
Radeon 740M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#338
GeForce MX230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#340
RADEON HD6410D
MSRP: $35|Avg: $5
99%
#341
GeForce 820M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
99%
#342
Radeon R7 M465X
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
98%
#344
GeForce 830A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
96%
#348
GeForce MX350
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
93%
#349
GeForce 840A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
92%
#350
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
91%
#351
HD Graphics 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 740M is significantly newer (2024 vs 2016). The Radeon 740M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro 455 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro 455 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 740M.

InsightRadeon 740MRadeon Pro 455
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%)
Leading raw performance (+2.2%)
Longevity
RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (4nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro 455 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 740M and Radeon Pro 455

AMD

Radeon 740M

The Radeon 740M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 4 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,045 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro 455

The Radeon Pro 455 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 855 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,113 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 740M scores 3,045 and the Radeon Pro 455 reaches 3,113 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 740M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon Pro 455 uses GCN 4.0, both on 4 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 256 (Radeon 740M) vs 768 (Radeon Pro 455). Raw compute: 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon 740M) vs 1.313 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 455).

FeatureRadeon 740MRadeon Pro 455
G3D Mark Score
3,045
3,113+2%
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
4 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
256
768+200%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.867 TFLOPS+118%
1.313 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
16
48+200%
L1 Cache
64 KB
192 KB+200%
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 740MRadeon Pro 455
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 740M) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 455) — the Radeon 740M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon 740MRadeon Pro 455
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 740M draws 45W versus the Radeon Pro 455's 35W — a 25% difference. The Radeon Pro 455 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 740M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 455). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon 740MRadeon Pro 455
TDP
45W
35W-22%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
67.7
88.9+31%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 740M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).

FeatureRadeon 740MRadeon Pro 455
MSRP
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$40
Codename
Phoenix2
Baffin
Release
January 31 2024
October 30 2016
Ranking
#581
#577