Radeon 740M vs Radeon R9 360
Radeon 740M
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 360
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 740M is positioned at rank 337 and the Radeon R9 360 is on rank 179, so the Radeon R9 360 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 740M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 360
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 740M is significantly newer (2024 vs 2015). The Radeon 740M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 360 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 740M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 360.
| Insight | Radeon 740M | Radeon R9 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 740M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 740M and Radeon R9 360
Radeon 740M
The Radeon 740M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 4 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,045 points.
Radeon R9 360
The Radeon R9 360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,032 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 740M scores 3,045 and the Radeon R9 360 reaches 3,032 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 740M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon R9 360 uses GCN 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (Radeon 740M) vs 512 (Radeon R9 360). Raw compute: 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon 740M) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 360). Boost clocks: 2800 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 740M | Radeon R9 360 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,045 | 3,032 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 512+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.867 TFLOPS+203% | 0.9472 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2800 MHz+203% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 16 | 32+100% |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 128 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 740M | Radeon R9 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 740M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 360) — the Radeon 740M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 740M | Radeon R9 360 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 740M draws 45W versus the Radeon R9 360's 30W — a 40% difference. The Radeon R9 360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 740M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 360). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon 740M | Radeon R9 360 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W | 30W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 165mm |
| Height | — | 110mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 67.7 | 101.1+49% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 740M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon 740M | Radeon R9 360 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $99 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $55 |
| Codename | Phoenix2 | Tropo |
| Release | January 31 2024 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #581 | #711 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 740M and Radeon R9 360
