Radeon 740M vs Radeon R9 360

AMD

Radeon 740M

2024Core: 800 MHzBoost: 2800 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 360

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon 740M vs Radeon R9 360 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 740M vs Radeon R9 360 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 740M vs Radeon R9 360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 740M

2024

Why buy it

  • 68.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 30.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • 50% higher power demand at 45W vs 30W.

Radeon R9 360

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 45W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon 740M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon 740M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 68.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (3,045 vs 3,032), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 740M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 4 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 360 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 360 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 740M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon 740M vs Radeon R9 360 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon 740M

The Radeon 740M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 4 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,045 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 360

The Radeon R9 360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,032 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 740M scores 3,045 and the Radeon R9 360 reaches 3,032 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 740M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon R9 360 uses GCN 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (Radeon 740M) vs 512 (Radeon R9 360). Raw compute: 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon 740M) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 360). Boost clocks: 2800 MHz vs 925 MHz.

FeatureRadeon 740MRadeon R9 360
G3D Mark Score
3,045
3,032
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
4 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
256
512+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.867 TFLOPS+203%
0.9472 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2800 MHz+203%
925 MHz
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
16
32+100%
L1 Cache
64 KB
128 KB+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 740MRadeon R9 360
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon 740M and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 360. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 740M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 360) — the Radeon 740M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon 740MRadeon R9 360
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 740M draws 45W versus the Radeon R9 360's 30W — a 40% difference. The Radeon R9 360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 740M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 360). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon 740MRadeon R9 360
TDP
45W
30W-33%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
165mm
Height
110mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
67.7
101.1+49%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 740M (2024 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon 740MRadeon R9 360
MSRP
$99
Codename
Phoenix2
Tropo
Release
January 31 2024
May 5 2015
Ranking
#581
#711

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.