Radeon HD 7790
VS
Radeon Pro 455

Radeon HD 7790 vs Radeon Pro 455

AMD

Radeon HD 7790

2013Core: 1000 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 455

2016Core: 855 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro 455 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7790.

InsightRadeon HD 7790Radeon Pro 455
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)
Leading raw performance (+0.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon Pro 455 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro 455 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $40), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 7790Radeon Pro 455
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+0.7%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7790 and Radeon Pro 455

AMD

Radeon HD 7790

The Radeon HD 7790 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 22 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,090 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon Pro 455

The Radeon Pro 455 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 855 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,113 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7790 scores 3,090 and the Radeon Pro 455 reaches 3,113 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7790 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 455 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (Radeon HD 7790) vs 768 (Radeon Pro 455). Raw compute: 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7790) vs 1.313 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 455).

FeatureRadeon HD 7790Radeon Pro 455
G3D Mark Score
3,090
3,113
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
896+17%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.792 TFLOPS+36%
1.313 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
56+17%
48
L1 Cache
224 KB+17%
192 KB
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 7790Radeon Pro 455
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 7790) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 455) — the Radeon Pro 455 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 7790Radeon Pro 455
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon HD 7790) vs 12_0 (Radeon Pro 455). Maximum simultaneous displays: 5 vs 0.

FeatureRadeon HD 7790Radeon Pro 455
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12_0
Max Displays
5
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon HD 7790) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 455). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 6.3.

FeatureRadeon HD 7790Radeon Pro 455
Encoder
VCE 2.0
VCE 3.4
Decoder
UVD 4.2
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7790 draws 85W versus the Radeon Pro 455's 35W — a 83.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 455 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (Radeon HD 7790) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 455). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 183mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRadeon HD 7790Radeon Pro 455
TDP
85W
35W-59%
Recommended PSU
400W
350W-13%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
183mm
1mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70
Perf/Watt
36.4
88.9+144%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 7790 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon Pro 455 launched at $0 and now averages $40. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 77.3 (Radeon HD 7790) vs 77.8 (Radeon Pro 455) — the Radeon Pro 455 offers 0.6% better value. The Radeon Pro 455 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon HD 7790Radeon Pro 455
MSRP
$149
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$40
$40
Performance per Dollar
77.3
77.8
Codename
Bonaire
Baffin
Release
March 22 2013
October 30 2016
Ranking
#579
#577