Radeon HD 7790
VS
Tesla C2070

Radeon HD 7790 vs Tesla C2070

AMD

Radeon HD 7790

2013Core: 1000 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla C2070

2011Core: 574 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Tesla C2070

#111
Tesla P40
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $150
100%
#112
GRID RTX6000-1Q
MSRP: $6299|Avg: $1500
96%
#113
Quadro RTX 8000
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9999
96%
#114
Quadro GP100
MSRP: $7000|Avg: $1335
94%
#115
Radeon Instinct MI60
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $600
93%
#272
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
7102%
#287
Tesla C2070
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $38
100%
#288
Quadro 2000 D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
100%
#290
FirePro V5900
MSRP: $599|Avg: $15
99%
#291
FirePro S9000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $156
97%
#294
GRID P40-4Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
95%
#295
RTXA5000-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500
95%
#296
GRID P6-2Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
94%
#299
GRID K220Q
MSRP: $469|Avg: $40
93%
#300
FirePro W9100
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $200
93%
#302
GRID T4-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1000
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Tesla C2070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (6 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7790.

InsightRadeon HD 7790Tesla C2070
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Leading raw performance (+1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+200%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (248mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Tesla C2070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Tesla C2070 holds the technical lead. Priced at $38 (vs $40), it costs 5% less, resulting in a 6.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 7790Tesla C2070
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+6.3%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40)
More affordable ($38)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7790 and Tesla C2070

AMD

Radeon HD 7790

The Radeon HD 7790 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 22 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,090 points. Launch price was $149.

NVIDIA

Tesla C2070

The Tesla C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,121 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7790 scores 3,090 and the Tesla C2070 reaches 3,121 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7790 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Tesla C2070 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (Radeon HD 7790) vs 448 (Tesla C2070). Raw compute: 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7790) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2070).

FeatureRadeon HD 7790Tesla C2070
G3D Mark Score
3,090
3,121+1%
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Fermi
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
896+100%
448
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.792 TFLOPS+74%
1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
48+200%
TMUs
56
56
L1 Cache
224 KB
896 KB+300%
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 7790Tesla C2070
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 7790 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2070 has 6 GB. The Tesla C2070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 7790) vs 768 KB (Tesla C2070) — the Tesla C2070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 7790Tesla C2070
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
6 GB+200%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon HD 7790) vs 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2070). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 5 vs 1.

FeatureRadeon HD 7790Tesla C2070
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 (11_0)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
5+400%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 7790) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Tesla C2070).

FeatureRadeon HD 7790Tesla C2070
Encoder
VCE 2.0
Decoder
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7790 draws 85W versus the Tesla C2070's 238W — a 94.7% difference. The Radeon HD 7790 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (Radeon HD 7790) vs 350W (Tesla C2070). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 183mm vs 248mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureRadeon HD 7790Tesla C2070
TDP
85W-64%
238W
Recommended PSU
400W
350W-13%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
183mm
248mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
70
Perf/Watt
36.4+178%
13.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 7790 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Tesla C2070 launched at $1499 and now averages $38. The Tesla C2070 costs 5% less ($2 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 77.3 (Radeon HD 7790) vs 82.1 (Tesla C2070) — the Tesla C2070 offers 6.2% better value. The Radeon HD 7790 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon HD 7790Tesla C2070
MSRP
$149-90%
$1499
Avg Price (30d)
$40
$38-5%
Performance per Dollar
77.3
82.1+6%
Codename
Bonaire
GF100
Release
March 22 2013
July 25 2011
Ranking
#579
#575