Radeon HD 7790 vs Tesla C2070 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 7790 vs Tesla C2070 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Radeon HD 7790 vs Tesla C2070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 7790
2013Why buy it
- β Costs $1,350 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- β Delivers 896% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.7 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- β Draws 85W instead of 238W, a 153W reduction.
- β Measures 183mm instead of 248mm, a 65mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Tesla C2070
2011Why buy it
- β 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- β2011 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β906% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 20.7 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- β180% higher power demand at 238W vs 85W.
- β35.5% longer card at 248mm vs 183mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 7790 vs Tesla C2070 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 7790
The Radeon HD 7790 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 22 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,090 points. Launch price was $149.

Tesla C2070
The Tesla C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,121 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7790 scores 3,090 and the Tesla C2070 reaches 3,121 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7790 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Tesla C2070 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (Radeon HD 7790) vs 448 (Tesla C2070). Raw compute: 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7790) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2070).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7790 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,090 | 3,121+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+100% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.792 TFLOPS+74% | 1.028 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 56 | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB | 896 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7790 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 7790 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2070 carries 6 GB. Tesla C2070 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7790 and 64-bit on the Tesla C2070. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 7790) vs 768 KB (Tesla C2070) β the Tesla C2070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7790 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon HD 7790) vs 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2070). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 5 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7790 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 5+400% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 7790) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Tesla C2070).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7790 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | β |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | β |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7790 draws 85W versus the Tesla C2070's 238W β a 94.7% difference. The Radeon HD 7790 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (Radeon HD 7790) vs 350W (Tesla C2070). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 183mm vs 248mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7790 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W-64% | 238W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 183mm | 248mm |
| Height | 111mm | β |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | β |
| Perf/Watt | 36.4+178% | 13.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 7790 came in at $149, while the Tesla C2070 launched at $1499. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7790 was 90.1% cheaper ($1350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.7 (Radeon HD 7790) vs 2.1 (Tesla C2070) β the Radeon HD 7790 offers 885.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 7790 (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7790 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-90% | $1499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.7+886% | 2.1 |
| Codename | Bonaire | GF100 |
| Release | March 22 2013 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #579 | #575 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















