
FirePro V7000

Radeon Pro 455
FirePro V7000 vs Radeon Pro 455 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V7000 vs Radeon Pro 455 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V7000 vs Radeon Pro 455: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V7000
2012Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 150W vs 35W.
- ❌24100% longer card at 242mm vs 1mm.
Radeon Pro 455
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 150W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 242mm, a 241mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V7000 vs Radeon Pro 455 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V7000
The FirePro V7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points. Launch price was $1,249.

Radeon Pro 455
The Radeon Pro 455 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 855 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,113 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V7000 scores 3,162 and the Radeon Pro 455 reaches 3,113 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V7000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Pro 455 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V7000) vs 768 (Radeon Pro 455). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro V7000) vs 1.313 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 455).
| Feature | FirePro V7000 | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,162+2% | 3,113 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+67% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.432 TFLOPS+85% | 1.313 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+67% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+67% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V7000 | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V7000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 455 carries 2 GB. FirePro V7000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V7000 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 455. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro V7000) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 455) — the Radeon Pro 455 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V7000 | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro V7000) vs 12_0 (Radeon Pro 455). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro V7000 | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro V7000) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 455). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | FirePro V7000 | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V7000 draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro 455's 35W — a 124.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 455 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V7000) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 455). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | FirePro V7000 | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 35W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 21.1 | 88.9+321% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V7000 came in at $899, while the Radeon Pro 455 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 455 was 100+% cheaper ($899 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.5 (FirePro V7000) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 455) — the Radeon Pro 455 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 455 (2016 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro V7000 | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.5 | Infinity |
| Codename | Pitcairn | Baffin |
| Release | August 27 2012 | October 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #462 | #577 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














