CPU
GPU
Radeon Pro 5300
Popular choices:
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro 5300 is positioned at rank 64 and the Quadro P4000 (móvel) is on rank 149, so the Radeon Pro 5300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5300
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P4000 (móvel)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro 5300 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro 5300 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P4000 (móvel) lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 5300.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5300 | Quadro P4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 5300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $290 for the Quadro P4000 (móvel), it costs 48% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 83.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5300 | Quadro P4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+83.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($290) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5300 and Quadro P4000 (móvel)
Radeon Pro 5300
The Radeon Pro 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,125 points.
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1228 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,500 points. Launch price was $819.61.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro 5300 scores 7,125 versus the Quadro P4000 (móvel)'s 7,500 — the Quadro P4000 (móvel) leads by 5.3%. The Radeon Pro 5300 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Quadro P4000 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on 7 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300) vs 1,792 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 4.224 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300) vs 4.398 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1228 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300 | Quadro P4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,125 | 7,500+5% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1792+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.224 TFLOPS | 4.398 TFLOPS+4% |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz+34% | 1228 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 112+40% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300 | Quadro P4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300 | Quadro P4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P4000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300 | Quadro P4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (Quadro P4000 (móvel)). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs NVDEC (3rd Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5300) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300 | Quadro P4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | NVENC (6th Gen) |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | NVDEC (3rd Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5300 draws 85W versus the Quadro P4000 (móvel)'s 100W — a 16.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 5300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5300) vs 350W (Quadro P4000 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300 | Quadro P4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W-15% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 83.8+12% | 75.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5300 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Quadro P4000 (móvel) launched at $819 and now averages $290. The Radeon Pro 5300 costs 48.3% less ($140 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 47.5 (Radeon Pro 5300) vs 25.9 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) — the Radeon Pro 5300 offers 83.4% better value. The Radeon Pro 5300 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300 | Quadro P4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-63% | $819 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-48% | $290 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.5+83% | 25.9 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | GP104 |
| Release | August 4 2020 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #351 | #326 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro 5300 and Quadro P4000 (móvel)
