Radeon Pro 5300 vs RadeonT 780M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro 5300 vs RadeonT 780M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro 5300 vs RadeonT 780M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro 5300

2020

Why buy it

✅2.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌RadeonT 780M is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌466.7% higher power demand at 85W vs 15W.

RadeonT 780M

2024

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 85W, a 70W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 5300 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro 5300 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (7,125 vs 7,098), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RadeonT 780M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 7nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2020. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro 5300 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro 5300 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RadeonT 780M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro 5300 vs RadeonT 780M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro 5300

The Radeon Pro 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,125 points.

RadeonT 780M

The RadeonT 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,098 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 5300 scores 7,125 and the RadeonT 780M reaches 7,098 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5300 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RadeonT 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300) vs 768 (RadeonT 780M). Raw compute: 4.224 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (RadeonT 780M). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 2900 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5300	RadeonT 780M
G3D Mark Score	7,125	7,098
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	7 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	1280+67%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.224 TFLOPS	8.909 TFLOPS+111%
Boost Clock	1650 MHz	2900 MHz+76%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80+67%	48
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling + RSR	FSR upscaling + RSR

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro 5300	RadeonT 780M
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5300 and 128-bit on the RadeonT 780M.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5300	RadeonT 780M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300) vs 12.2 (RadeonT 780M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5300	RadeonT 780M
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300) vs VCN 4.0 (RadeonT 780M). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5300) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RadeonT 780M).

Feature	Radeon Pro 5300	RadeonT 780M
Encoder	VCN 2.0	VCN 4.0
Decoder	VCN 2.0	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 5300 draws 85W versus the RadeonT 780M's 15W — a 140% difference. The RadeonT 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5300) vs 350W (RadeonT 780M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5300	RadeonT 780M
TDP	85W	15W-82%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	0mm	0mm
Height	0mm	0mm
Slots	0	0
Perf/Watt	83.8	473.2+465%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RadeonT 780M (2024 vs 2020).

Feature	Radeon Pro 5300	RadeonT 780M
MSRP	$300	—
Codename	Navi 14	Phoenix
Release	August 4 2020	January 31 2024
Ranking	#351	#359

Search Radeon Pro 5300 on Amazon

Search RadeonT 780M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.