
Radeon Pro 5300
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 5300
2020Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 120W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌77.5% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.8 vs 41.2 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Radeon RX 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅31.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $131 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 73.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 41.2 vs 23.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌41.2% higher power demand at 120W vs 85W.
Radeon Pro 5300
2020Radeon RX 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 120W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅31.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $131 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 73.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 41.2 vs 23.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌77.5% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.8 vs 41.2 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌41.2% higher power demand at 120W vs 85W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 570 better than Radeon Pro 5300?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro 5300 make more sense than Radeon RX 570?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5300 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5300 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 16 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5300 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 256 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 78 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5300 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5300 and Radeon RX 570

Radeon Pro 5300
Radeon Pro 5300
The Radeon Pro 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,125 points.

Radeon RX 570
Radeon RX 570
The Radeon RX 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1168 MHz to 1244 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,967 points. Launch price was $169.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5300 scores 7,125 and the Radeon RX 570 reaches 6,967 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5300 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon RX 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 570). Raw compute: 4.224 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300) vs 5.095 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 570). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1244 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,125+2% | 6,967 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2048+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.224 TFLOPS | 5.095 TFLOPS+21% |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz+33% | 1244 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 570 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro 5300 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300) vs 12 (Radeon RX 570). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 5+25% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 570). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5300) vs H.265,H.264 (Radeon RX 570).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.265,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5300 draws 85W versus the Radeon RX 570's 120W — a 34.1% difference. The Radeon Pro 5300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5300) vs 450W (Radeon RX 570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W-29% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 83.8+44% | 58.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5300 launched at $300 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 570 launched at $169. The Radeon RX 570 costs 43.7% less ($131 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 23.8 (Radeon Pro 5300) vs 41.2 (Radeon RX 570) — the Radeon RX 570 offers 73.1% better value. The Radeon Pro 5300 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $169-44% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.8 | 41.2+73% |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | August 4 2020 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #351 | #356 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












