
Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU vs Radeon HD 8950

Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8950
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is positioned at rank #5 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is significantly newer (2018 vs 2012). The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 8950 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 8950 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU and Radeon HD 8950

Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,853 points.

Radeon HD 8950
The Radeon HD 8950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,828 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU scores 2,853 and the Radeon HD 8950 reaches 2,828 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon HD 8950 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 8950). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8950). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,853 | 2,828 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 ×2+100% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2+275% | 2.867 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz+20% | 1250 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 ×2+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 224 ×2+100% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+100% | 448 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+433% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8950 has 3 GB. The Radeon HD 8950 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon HD 8950) — the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 3 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+433% | 0.75 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU draws 300W versus the Radeon HD 8950's 200W — a 40% difference. The Radeon HD 8950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU) vs 500W (Radeon HD 8950). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 200W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 9.5 | 14.1+48% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $499 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Tahiti |
| Release | August 26 2018 | January 31 2012 |
| Ranking | #592 | #454 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












