Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU vs Radeon R7 260

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is positioned at rank #5 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU

#1

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

155%

#5

Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R7 260 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R7 260 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU	Radeon R7 260
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R7 260 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU Benchmark Check

Radeon R7 260 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU and Radeon R7 260

Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU

The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,853 points.

Radeon R7 260

The Radeon R7 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 17 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,892 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU scores 2,853 and the Radeon R7 260 reaches 2,892 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon R7 260 uses GCN 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU) vs 768 (Radeon R7 260). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 260). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1100 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU	Radeon R7 260
G3D Mark Score	2,853	2,892+1%
Architecture	GCN 5.0	GCN 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	3584 ×2+367%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	10.75 TFLOPS ×2+600%	1.536 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1500 MHz+36%	1100 MHz
ROPs	64 ×2+300%	16
TMUs	224 ×2+367%	48
L1 Cache	896 KB+367%	192 KB
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU	Radeon R7 260
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 260 has 1 GB. The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 260) — the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU	Radeon R7 260
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU draws 300W versus the Radeon R7 260's 95W — a 103.8% difference. The Radeon R7 260 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU) vs 400W (Radeon R7 260). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU	Radeon R7 260
TDP	300W	95W-68%
Recommended PSU	350W-13%	400W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	—	170mm
Height	—	112mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	80
Perf/Watt	9.5	30.4+220%