
Radeon HD 8950 vs Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU

Radeon HD 8950
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is significantly newer (2018 vs 2012). The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 8950 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 8950 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8950 | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8950 and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU

Radeon HD 8950
The Radeon HD 8950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,828 points. Launch price was $449.

Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,853 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8950 scores 2,828 and the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU reaches 2,853 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8950 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon HD 8950) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU). Raw compute: 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8950) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8950 | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,828 | 2,853 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 3584 ×2+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.867 TFLOPS | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2+275% |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | 1500 MHz+20% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 ×2+100% |
| TMUs | 112 | 224 ×2+100% |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | 896 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 4 MB+433% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8950 | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8950 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 8950 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Radeon HD 8950) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU) — the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8950 | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB+50% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 4 MB+433% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8950 draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU's 300W — a 40% difference. The Radeon HD 8950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 8950) vs 350W (Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8950 | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-33% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 14.1+48% | 9.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8950 | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $499 | — |
| Codename | Tahiti | Vega 10 |
| Release | January 31 2012 | August 26 2018 |
| Ranking | #454 | #592 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












