Radeon HD 8950 vs Radeon R7 260
Radeon HD 8950
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 260
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 260 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 8950 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8950 | Radeon R7 260 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 260 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 260 holds the technical lead. Priced at $110 (vs $499), it costs 78% less, resulting in a 363.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8950 | Radeon R7 260 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+363.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($499) | ✅More affordable ($110) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8950 and Radeon R7 260
Radeon HD 8950
The Radeon HD 8950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,828 points. Launch price was $449.
Radeon R7 260
The Radeon R7 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 17 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,892 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8950 scores 2,828 and the Radeon R7 260 reaches 2,892 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8950 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 260 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon HD 8950) vs 768 (Radeon R7 260). Raw compute: 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8950) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 260). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 1100 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8950 | Radeon R7 260 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,828 | 2,892+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+133% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.867 TFLOPS+87% | 1.536 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz+14% | 1100 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112+133% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+133% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8950 | Radeon R7 260 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8950 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 260 has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 8950 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Radeon HD 8950) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 260) — the Radeon HD 8950 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8950 | Radeon R7 260 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB+200% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 96 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon HD 8950) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 260). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8950 | Radeon R7 260 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12 (12_0) |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8950) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 260). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8950 | Radeon R7 260 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.1 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8950 draws 200W versus the Radeon R7 260's 95W — a 71.2% difference. The Radeon R7 260 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 8950) vs 400W (Radeon R7 260). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 170mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8950 | Radeon R7 260 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 95W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 400W-20% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 170mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 14.1 | 30.4+116% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8950 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $499, while the Radeon R7 260 launched at $109 and now averages $110. The Radeon R7 260 costs 78% less ($389 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.7 (Radeon HD 8950) vs 26.3 (Radeon R7 260) — the Radeon R7 260 offers 361.4% better value. The Radeon R7 260 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8950 | Radeon R7 260 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $109-78% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $499 | $110-78% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.7 | 26.3+361% |
| Codename | Tahiti | Bonaire |
| Release | January 31 2012 | December 17 2013 |
| Ranking | #454 | #591 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 8950 and Radeon R7 260
