G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU vs Radeon Pro Vega II FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU vs Radeon Pro Vega II: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅14.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs Unknown).
✅Radeon Pro Vega II is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 300W instead of 475W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).

Radeon Pro Vega II

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: GCN 5.1 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌58.3% higher power demand at 475W vs 300W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 14.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (15,633 vs 15,597), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 32 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro Vega II makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and lighter 1440p, Radeon Pro Vega II is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU vs Radeon Pro Vega II Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.

Radeon Pro Vega II

The Radeon Pro Vega II is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 3 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1574 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 475W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,597 points. Launch price was $2,199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU scores 15,633 and the Radeon Pro Vega II reaches 15,597 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon Pro Vega II uses GCN 5.1, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 14.09 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega II). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1720 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon Pro Vega II
G3D Mark Score	15,633	15,597
Architecture	GCN 5.0	GCN 5.1
Process Node	14 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	3584 ×2	4096+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)	10.75 TFLOPS ×2	14.09 TFLOPS+31%
Boost Clock	1500 MHz	1720 MHz+15%
ROPs	64 ×2	64
TMUs	224 ×2	256+14%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	1 MB+14%
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon Pro Vega II
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has 32 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega II carries 0 MB. Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU and 384-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega II.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon Pro Vega II
VRAM Capacity	32 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	384-bit+200%
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon Pro Vega II
DirectX	12.2	12.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	0	6

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega II).

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon Pro Vega II
Encoder	VCN 3.0	VCE 4.1
Decoder	VCN 3.0	UVD 7.2
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU draws 300W versus the Radeon Pro Vega II's 475W — a 45.2% difference. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega II). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon Pro Vega II
TDP	300W-37%	475W
Recommended PSU	650W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	267mm	267mm
Height	111mm	120mm
Slots	2-50%	4
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85°C
Perf/Watt	52.1+59%	32.8

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro Vega II (2019 vs 2018).

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon Pro Vega II
MSRP	—	$2199
Codename	Vega 10	Vega 20
Release	August 26 2018	June 3 2019
Ranking	#592	#138

Search Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro Vega II on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.