G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU vs Radeon RX 5700 XT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU vs Radeon RX 5700 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅14.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌Older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 36.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 225W.

Radeon RX 5700 XT

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 225W instead of 300W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 14.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon RX 5700 XT instead at 16,183 vs 15,633, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 5700 XT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: native frame generation with FSR Frame Generation (2023), while Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has no comparable frame-generation support, a 7nm process instead of 14nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2018. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 5700 XT makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU vs Radeon RX 5700 XT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.

Radeon RX 5700 XT

The Radeon RX 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1605 MHz to 1905 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,183 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU scores 15,633 and the Radeon RX 5700 XT reaches 16,183 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon RX 5700 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 5700 XT). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 9.754 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700 XT). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1905 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon RX 5700 XT
G3D Mark Score	15,633	16,183+4%
Architecture	GCN 5.0	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	3584 ×2+40%	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	10.75 TFLOPS ×2+10%	9.754 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1500 MHz	1905 MHz+27%
ROPs	64 ×2	64
TMUs	224 ×2+40%	160
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 5700 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon RX 5700 XT
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has 32 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5700 XT carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 5700 XT.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon RX 5700 XT
VRAM Capacity	32 GB+300%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 12 (Radeon RX 5700 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon RX 5700 XT
DirectX	12.2+2%	12
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	0	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs VCE (Radeon RX 5700 XT). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs UVD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 5700 XT).

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon RX 5700 XT
Encoder	VCN 3.0	VCE
Decoder	VCN 3.0	UVD
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265/HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU draws 300W versus the Radeon RX 5700 XT's 225W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon RX 5700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 600W (Radeon RX 5700 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 272mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon RX 5700 XT
TDP	300W	225W-25%
Recommended PSU	650W	600W-8%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	6-pin + 8-pin
Length	267mm	272mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	75°C
Perf/Watt	52.1	71.9+38%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon RX 5700 XT (2019 vs 2018).

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon RX 5700 XT
MSRP	—	$449
Codename	Vega 10	Navi 10
Release	August 26 2018	July 7 2019
Ranking	#592	#128

Search Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 5700 XT on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.