G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 16 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 2000E Ada Generation across 19 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
❌328.6% higher power demand at 300W vs 70W.

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

2024

Why buy it

✅8.9% more average FPS across 19 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 70W instead of 300W, a 230W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

2018

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

2024

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 16 GB).

Why buy it

✅8.9% more average FPS across 19 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 70W instead of 300W, a 230W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 2000E Ada Generation across 19 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
❌328.6% higher power demand at 300W vs 70W.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

So, is RTX 2000E Ada Generation better than Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU?

Yes. RTX 2000E Ada Generation is clearly the better overall GPU here. RTX 2000E Ada Generation averages 8.9% more FPS across 19 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 15,252 vs 15,633 in G3D Mark. On top of that, RTX 2000E Ada Generation is a 2024 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is a 2018 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 2000E Ada Generation is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2018, the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling, and a 5nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RTX 2000E Ada Generation is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. RTX 2000E Ada Generation is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $999 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 8.9% more estimated average FPS across 19 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (15,252 vs 15,633). It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if RTX 2000E Ada Generation is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Benchmark Check

RTX 2000E Ada Generation Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
1080p
low	166 FPS	199 FPS
medium	148 FPS	184 FPS
high	124 FPS	163 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	144 FPS
1440p
low	146 FPS	180 FPS
medium	124 FPS	155 FPS
high	91 FPS	130 FPS
ultra	65 FPS	119 FPS
4K
low	69 FPS	113 FPS
medium	60 FPS	99 FPS
high	42 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	68 FPS

Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Open RTX 2000E Ada Generation

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
1080p
low	301 FPS	342 FPS
medium	255 FPS	285 FPS
high	201 FPS	217 FPS
ultra	158 FPS	170 FPS
1440p
low	203 FPS	212 FPS
medium	172 FPS	181 FPS
high	146 FPS	150 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	120 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	109 FPS
medium	82 FPS	90 FPS
high	69 FPS	77 FPS
ultra	52 FPS	59 FPS

Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Open RTX 2000E Ada Generation

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
1080p
low	703 FPS	686 FPS
medium	563 FPS	549 FPS
high	469 FPS	458 FPS
ultra	352 FPS	343 FPS
1440p
low	528 FPS	456 FPS
medium	422 FPS	385 FPS
high	352 FPS	326 FPS
ultra	264 FPS	257 FPS
4K
low	352 FPS	335 FPS
medium	281 FPS	274 FPS
high	234 FPS	211 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	163 FPS

Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Open RTX 2000E Ada Generation

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
1080p
low	259 FPS	617 FPS
medium	224 FPS	538 FPS
high	190 FPS	452 FPS
ultra	153 FPS	343 FPS
1440p
low	197 FPS	507 FPS
medium	175 FPS	412 FPS
high	149 FPS	343 FPS
ultra	118 FPS	257 FPS
4K
low	121 FPS	311 FPS
medium	105 FPS	275 FPS
high	83 FPS	229 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	172 FPS

Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Open RTX 2000E Ada Generation

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU and RTX 2000E Ada Generation

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,252 points. Launch price was $649.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU scores 15,633 and the RTX 2000E Ada Generation reaches 15,252 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 14 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 2130 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
G3D Mark Score	15,633+2%	15,252
Architecture	GCN 5.0	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	14 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	3584 ×2+27%	2816
Compute (TFLOPS)	10.75 TFLOPS ×2	12 TFLOPS+12%
Boost Clock	1500 MHz	2130 MHz+42%
ROPs	64 ×2+33%	48
TMUs	224 ×2+155%	88
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	2.8 MB+218%
L2 Cache	4 MB	12 MB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX 2000E Ada Generation gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) — the RTX 2000E Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
VRAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB	12 MB+200%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	0	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation).

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Encoder	VCN 3.0	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	VCN 3.0	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU draws 300W versus the RTX 2000E Ada Generation's 70W — a 124.3% difference. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 650W (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
TDP	300W	70W-77%
Recommended PSU	650W	650W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	167mm
Height	111mm	68mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75°C	75°C
Perf/Watt	52.1	217.9+318%