G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro VII vs Radeon PRO W7500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro VII vs Radeon PRO W7500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro VII

2020

Why buy it

✅17.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Radeon PRO W7500 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌
342.7% HIGHER MSRP
$1,899 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($1,899 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.
❌41.2% longer card at 305mm vs 216mm.

Radeon PRO W7500

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,470 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
✅Delivers 343.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.0 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.
✅Measures 216mm instead of 305mm, a 89mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro VII across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro VII is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 17.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon PRO W7500 instead at 13,298 vs 13,264, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W7500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 7nm, 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2020. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon PRO W7500 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,470 cheaper on MSRP at $429 vs $1,899, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 343.8% (31.0 vs 7.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon Pro VII still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon Pro VII vs Radeon PRO W7500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro VII

The Radeon Pro VII is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2020. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,264 points. Launch price was $1,899.

Radeon PRO W7500

The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro VII scores 13,264 and the Radeon PRO W7500 reaches 13,298 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro VII is built on GCN 5.1 while the Radeon PRO W7500 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon Pro VII) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500). Raw compute: 13.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro VII) vs 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500). Boost clocks: 1700 MHz vs 1700 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro VII	Radeon PRO W7500
G3D Mark Score	13,264	13,298
Architecture	GCN 5.1	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	7 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	3840+114%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	13.06 TFLOPS+7%	12.19 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1700 MHz	1700 MHz
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	240+114%	112
L1 Cache	960 KB+88%	512 KB
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling + RSR

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro VII	Radeon PRO W7500
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro VII has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7500 carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro VII gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro VII and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W7500. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro VII) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7500) — the Radeon Pro VII has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro VII	Radeon PRO W7500
VRAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro VII) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro VII	Radeon PRO W7500
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	6+50%	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro VII) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500). Decoder: UVD 7.2 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro VII) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500).

Feature	Radeon Pro VII	Radeon PRO W7500
Encoder	VCE 4.1	VCN 4.0
Decoder	UVD 7.2	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro VII draws 250W versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 70W — a 112.5% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro VII) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 305mm vs 216mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro VII	Radeon PRO W7500
TDP	250W	70W-72%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	305mm	216mm
Height	111mm	115mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	85°C	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	53.1	190.0+258%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro VII came in at $1899, while the Radeon PRO W7500 launched at $429. On MSRP, Radeon PRO W7500 was 77.4% cheaper ($1470 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.0 (Radeon Pro VII) vs 31.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) — the Radeon PRO W7500 offers 342.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W7500 (2023 vs 2020).

Feature	Radeon Pro VII	Radeon PRO W7500
MSRP	$1899	$429-77%
Performance per Dollar	7.0	31.0+343%
Codename	Vega 20	Navi 33
Release	May 13 2020	August 3 2023
Ranking	#194	#192

Search Radeon Pro VII on Amazon

Search Radeon PRO W7500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.