Radeon Pro VII vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

AMD

Radeon Pro VII

2020Core: 1400 MHzBoost: 1700 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

2021Core: 1800 MHzBoost: 1967 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon Pro VII vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro VII vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro VII vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro VII

2020

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,600 less on MSRP ($1,899 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 85.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.0 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($1,899 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
  • Draws 250W instead of 400W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

2021

Why buy it

  • 11.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 84.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $3,499 MSRPvs$1,899 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
  • 60% higher power demand at 400W vs 250W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro VII instead at 13,264 vs 13,182, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 602 vs 0 ray-tracing units and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2020. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro VII makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,600 cheaper on MSRP at $1,899 vs $3,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 85.4% (7.0 vs 3.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and lighter 1440p, Radeon Pro VII is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro VII vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon Pro VII

The Radeon Pro VII is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2020. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,264 points. Launch price was $1,899.

AMD

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro VII scores 13,264 and the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot reaches 13,182 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro VII is built on GCN 5.1 while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon Pro VII) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Raw compute: 13.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro VII) vs 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Boost clocks: 1700 MHz vs 1967 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro VIIRadeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
G3D Mark Score
13,264
13,182
Architecture
GCN 5.1
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
7 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
3840
3840 ×2
Compute (TFLOPS)
13.06 TFLOPS
15.11 TFLOPS ×2+16%
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1967 MHz+16%
ROPs
64
96 ×2+50%
TMUs
240
240 ×2
L1 Cache
960 KB+25%
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling + RSR

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro VIIRadeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro VII has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro VII gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro VII and 384-bit on the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot.

FeatureRadeon Pro VIIRadeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
VRAM Capacity
16 GB+100%
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
384-bit+200%
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro VII) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon Pro VIIRadeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
DirectX
12.1
12.2
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro VII) vs VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Decoder: UVD 7.2 vs VCN 4.0 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro VII) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot).

FeatureRadeon Pro VIIRadeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Encoder
VCE 4.1
VCN 4.0 (2x)
Decoder
UVD 7.2
VCN 4.0 (2x)
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro VII draws 250W versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 400W — a 46.2% difference. The Radeon Pro VII is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro VII) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 305mm vs 280mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.

FeatureRadeon Pro VIIRadeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
TDP
250W-38%
400W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
305mm
280mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
85°C
Perf/Watt
53.1+61%
33.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro VII came in at $1899, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot launched at $3499. On MSRP, Radeon Pro VII was 45.7% cheaper ($1600 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.0 (Radeon Pro VII) vs 3.8 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — the Radeon Pro VII offers 84.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot (2021 vs 2020).

FeatureRadeon Pro VIIRadeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
MSRP
$1899-46%
$3499
Performance per Dollar
7.0+84%
3.8
Codename
Vega 20
Navi 21
Release
May 13 2020
August 3 2021
Ranking
#194
#157

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.