G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro W5500 vs Radeon R9 295X2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro W5500 vs Radeon R9 295X2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro W5500

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 283.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.3 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 125W instead of 500W, a 375W reduction.
✅Measures 241mm instead of 307mm, a 66mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 295X2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Radeon R9 295X2

2014

Why buy it

✅30.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
275.7% HIGHER MSRP
$1,499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 22.3 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌300% higher power demand at 500W vs 125W.
❌27.4% longer card at 307mm vs 241mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 295X2 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 30.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro W5500 instead at 8,913 vs 8,734, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro W5500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 7nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro W5500 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,100 cheaper on MSRP at $399 vs $1,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 283.4% (22.3 vs 5.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R9 295X2 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon Pro W5500 vs Radeon R9 295X2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro W5500

The Radeon Pro W5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1400 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,913 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R9 295X2

The Radeon R9 295X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 29 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1018 MHz. It has 2816 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 500W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,734 points. Launch price was $1,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro W5500 scores 8,913 and the Radeon R9 295X2 reaches 8,734 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5500 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon R9 295X2 uses GCN 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 295X2). Raw compute: 3.942 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 5.733 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon R9 295X2). Boost clocks: 1400 MHz vs 1018 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5500	Radeon R9 295X2
G3D Mark Score	8,913+2%	8,734
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	GCN 2.0
Process Node	7 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1408	2816 ×2+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.942 TFLOPS	5.733 TFLOPS ×2+45%
Boost Clock	1400 MHz+38%	1018 MHz
ROPs	32	64 ×2+100%
TMUs	88	176 ×2+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling + RSR	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro W5500	Radeon R9 295X2
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro W5500 and 512-bit x2 on the Radeon R9 295X2. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 295X2) — the Radeon Pro W5500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5500	Radeon R9 295X2
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit	512-bit x2+300%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 295X2). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5500	Radeon R9 295X2
DirectX	12.1	12.0
Vulkan	1.2+9%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+7%	4.3
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 295X2). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 295X2).

Feature	Radeon Pro W5500	Radeon R9 295X2
Encoder	VCN 2.0	VCE 2.0
Decoder	VCN 2.0	UVD 4.2
Codecs	HEVC,H.264,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro W5500 draws 125W versus the Radeon R9 295X2's 500W — a 120% difference. The Radeon Pro W5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 1000W (Radeon R9 295X2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 307mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5500	Radeon R9 295X2
TDP	125W-75%	500W
Recommended PSU	500W-50%	1000W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 8-pin
Length	241mm	307mm
Height	111mm	114mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	65°C-13%
Perf/Watt	71.3+307%	17.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro W5500 came in at $399, while the Radeon R9 295X2 launched at $1499. On MSRP, Radeon Pro W5500 was 73.4% cheaper ($1100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 22.3 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 5.8 (Radeon R9 295X2) — the Radeon Pro W5500 offers 284.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro W5500 (2020 vs 2014).

Feature	Radeon Pro W5500	Radeon R9 295X2
MSRP	$399-73%	$1499
Performance per Dollar	22.3+284%	5.8
Codename	Navi 14	Vesuvius
Release	February 10 2020	April 29 2014
Ranking	#294	#303

Search Radeon Pro W5500 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 295X2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.