GeForce GTX TITAN Black
Radeon Pro W5500
GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs Radeon Pro W5500 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs Radeon Pro W5500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs Radeon Pro W5500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
2014Why buy it
- ✅18.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌150.4% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 22.3 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 250W vs 125W.
Radeon Pro W5500
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 143.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.3 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 250W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX TITAN Black across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs Radeon Pro W5500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 889 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,177 points. Launch price was $999.
Radeon Pro W5500
The Radeon Pro W5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1400 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,913 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black scores 9,177 and the Radeon Pro W5500 reaches 8,913 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro W5500 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500). Raw compute: 5.645 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 3.942 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1400 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,177+3% | 8,913 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880+105% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.645 TFLOPS+43% | 3.942 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | 1400 MHz+43% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240+173% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro W5500 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5500 carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro W5500 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX TITAN Black and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro W5500. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro W5500) — the Radeon Pro W5500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro W5500). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5500).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro W5500's 125W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon Pro W5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 500W (Radeon Pro W5500). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 125W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 36.7 | 71.3+94% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX TITAN Black came in at $999, while the Radeon Pro W5500 launched at $399. On MSRP, Radeon Pro W5500 was 60.1% cheaper ($600 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 22.3 (Radeon Pro W5500) — the Radeon Pro W5500 offers 142.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro W5500 (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $399-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.2 | 22.3+142% |
| Codename | GK110B | Navi 14 |
| Release | February 18 2014 | February 10 2020 |
| Ranking | #288 | #294 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX TITAN Black and Radeon Pro W5500
