
Radeon Pro W5500
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 480
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro W5500
2020Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 150W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌74.2% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.3 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Radeon RX 480
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 67.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.3 vs 22.3 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 241mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 150W vs 125W.
Radeon Pro W5500
2020Radeon RX 480
2016Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 150W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 67.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.3 vs 22.3 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 241mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌74.2% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.3 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 150W vs 125W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro W5500 better than Radeon RX 480?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 480 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 18 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 385 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 96 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 62 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5500 and Radeon RX 480

Radeon Pro W5500
Radeon Pro W5500
The Radeon Pro W5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1400 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,913 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 480
Radeon RX 480
The Radeon RX 480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,546 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W5500 scores 8,913 and the Radeon RX 480 reaches 8,546 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5500 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon RX 480 uses GCN 4.0, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 480). Raw compute: 3.942 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 480). Boost clocks: 1400 MHz vs 1266 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,913+4% | 8,546 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 2304+64% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.942 TFLOPS | 5.834 TFLOPS+48% |
| Boost Clock | 1400 MHz+11% | 1266 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 88 | 144+64% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 480). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 480). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 480).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | HEVC,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5500 draws 125W versus the Radeon RX 480's 150W — a 18.2% difference. The Radeon Pro W5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 500W (Radeon RX 480). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 240mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W-17% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 95mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 71.3+25% | 57.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro W5500 launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 480 launched at $229. The Radeon RX 480 costs 42.6% less ($170 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 22.3 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 37.3 (Radeon RX 480) — the Radeon RX 480 offers 67.3% better value. The Radeon Pro W5500 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $229-43% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.3 | 37.3+67% |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Ellesmere |
| Release | February 10 2020 | June 29 2016 |
| Ranking | #294 | #305 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













