
Radeon Pro W5700X
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 9060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro W5700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 9060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 9060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌301.2% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.6 vs 68.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Radeon RX 9060
2025Why buy it
- ✅7.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 290.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 68.8 vs 17.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro W5700X
2019Radeon RX 9060
2025Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅7.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 290.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 68.8 vs 17.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 9060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 9060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌301.2% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.6 vs 68.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 9060 better than Radeon Pro W5700X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro W5700X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700X | Radeon RX 9060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 54 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700X | Radeon RX 9060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 254 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700X | Radeon RX 9060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 778 FPS | 688 FPS |
| medium | 624 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 528 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 415 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 289 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 396 FPS | 355 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 182 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700X | Radeon RX 9060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 390 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 341 FPS | 596 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 554 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 462 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 385 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 289 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 193 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5700X and Radeon RX 9060

Radeon Pro W5700X
Radeon Pro W5700X
The Radeon Pro W5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,591 points. Launch price was $999.

Radeon RX 9060
Radeon RX 9060
The Radeon RX 9060 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 5 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2990 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,121 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W5700X scores 17,591 and the Radeon RX 9060 reaches 17,121 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5700X is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon RX 9060 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 7 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 9060). Raw compute: 9.4 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs 21.43 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 9060). Boost clocks: 2040 MHz vs 2990 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | Radeon RX 9060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,591+3% | 17,121 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 4.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+29% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.4 TFLOPS | 21.43 TFLOPS+128% |
| Boost Clock | 2040 MHz | 2990 MHz+47% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144+29% | 112 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR Upscaling + Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 9060 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro W5700X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | Radeon RX 9060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro W5700X comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 9060 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro W5700X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | Radeon RX 9060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 9060). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | Radeon RX 9060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs VCN 5.0 (Radeon RX 9060). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 5.0. Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264 (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 9060).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | Radeon RX 9060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 5.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 5.0 |
| Codecs | HEVC,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5700X draws 205W versus the Radeon RX 9060's 132W — a 43.3% difference. The Radeon RX 9060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs 450W (Radeon RX 9060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 305mm vs 240mm, occupying 4 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | Radeon RX 9060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 205W | 132W-36% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 450W-31% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 305mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 4 | 2-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 85.8 | 129.7+51% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro W5700X launched at $999 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 9060 launched at $249. The Radeon RX 9060 costs 75.1% less ($750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.6 (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs 68.8 (Radeon RX 9060) — the Radeon RX 9060 offers 290.9% better value. The Radeon RX 9060 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | Radeon RX 9060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $249-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.6 | 68.8+291% |
| Codename | Navi 10 | Navi 44 |
| Release | December 11 2019 | August 5 2025 |
| Ranking | #130 | #111 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












