Radeon Pro W5700X
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Radeon Pro W5700X vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro W5700X vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Pro W5700X vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro W5700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 2000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌RTX 2000 Ada Generation is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌59.8% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$625 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.6 vs 27.4 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $625 MSRP).
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
2024Why buy it
- ✅20.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $374 less on MSRP ($625 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 55.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.4 vs 17.6 G3D/$ ($625 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro W5700X vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon Pro W5700X
The Radeon Pro W5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,591 points. Launch price was $999.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,147 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W5700X scores 17,591 and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation reaches 17,147 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5700X is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 9.4 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2040 MHz vs 2130 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,591+3% | 17,147 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2816+22% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.4 TFLOPS | 12 TFLOPS+28% |
| Boost Clock | 2040 MHz | 2130 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 144+64% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro W5700X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 16 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro W5700X and 128-bit on the RTX 2000 Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264 (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | HEVC,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5700X draws 205W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 98.2% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs 650W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 305mm vs 167mm, occupying 4 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 205W | 70W-66% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 305mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 4 | 2-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 85.8 | 245.0+186% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon Pro W5700X came in at $999, while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation launched at $625. On MSRP, RTX 2000 Ada Generation was 37.4% cheaper ($374 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.6 (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs 27.4 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation offers 55.7% better value. The newer card here is RTX 2000 Ada Generation (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $625-37% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.6 | 27.4+56% |
| Codename | Navi 10 | AD107 |
| Release | December 11 2019 | February 12 2024 |
| Ranking | #130 | #107 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro W5700X and RTX 2000 Ada Generation
