
Radeon Pro W6900X

Radeon RX 9060
Radeon Pro W6900X vs Radeon RX 9060 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro W6900X vs Radeon RX 9060 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Pro W6900X vs Radeon RX 9060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro W6900X
2021Why buy it
- ✅50.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ❌Radeon RX 9060 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌2309.6% HIGHER MSRP$6,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 68.8 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 132W.
Radeon RX 9060
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2269.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 68.8 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 132W instead of 300W, a 168W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W6900X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro W6900X vs Radeon RX 9060 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro W6900X
The Radeon Pro W6900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2150 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,413 points. Launch price was $4,999.

Radeon RX 9060
The Radeon RX 9060 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 5 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2990 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,121 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W6900X scores 17,413 and the Radeon RX 9060 reaches 17,121 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W6900X is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon RX 9060 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 7 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (Radeon Pro W6900X) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 9060). Raw compute: 22.02 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W6900X) vs 21.43 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 9060). Boost clocks: 2150 MHz vs 2990 MHz. Ray tracing: 80 RT cores (Radeon Pro W6900X) vs 28 (Radeon RX 9060).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W6900X | Radeon RX 9060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,413+2% | 17,121 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 4.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120+186% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.02 TFLOPS+3% | 21.43 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2150 MHz | 2990 MHz+39% |
| ROPs | 128+100% | 64 |
| TMUs | 320+186% | 112 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR Upscaling + Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 80+186% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 9060 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro W6900X does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W6900X | Radeon RX 9060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro W6900X has 32 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 9060 carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro W6900X gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro W6900X and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 9060.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W6900X | Radeon RX 9060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+300% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon Pro W6900X) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 9060). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W6900X | Radeon RX 9060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro W6900X) vs VCN 5.0 (Radeon RX 9060). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs VCN 5.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro W6900X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 9060).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W6900X | Radeon RX 9060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 5.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 5.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W6900X draws 300W versus the Radeon RX 9060's 132W — a 77.8% difference. The Radeon RX 9060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon Pro W6900X) vs 450W (Radeon RX 9060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 4 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W6900X | Radeon RX 9060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 132W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 450W-31% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | 120mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 4 | 2-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 58.0 | 129.7+124% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon Pro W6900X came in at $6000, while the Radeon RX 9060 launched at $249. On MSRP, Radeon RX 9060 was 95.9% cheaper ($5751 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (Radeon Pro W6900X) vs 68.8 (Radeon RX 9060) — the Radeon RX 9060 offers 2272.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 9060 (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W6900X | Radeon RX 9060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6000 | $249-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.9 | 68.8+2272% |
| Codename | Navi 21 | Navi 44 |
| Release | August 3 2021 | August 5 2025 |
| Ranking | #101 | #111 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














