Quadro RTX 6000
Radeon Pro W6900X
Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon Pro W6900X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon Pro W6900X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon Pro W6900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 6000
2018Why buy it
- ✅7.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 260W instead of 300W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌5% HIGHER MSRP$6,300 MSRPvs$6,000 MSRP
Radeon Pro W6900X
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($6,000 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 24 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌15.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 260W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon Pro W6900X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro RTX 6000
The Quadro RTX 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,887 points. Launch price was $6,299.
Radeon Pro W6900X
The Radeon Pro W6900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2150 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,413 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 6000 scores 17,887 and the Radeon Pro W6900X reaches 17,413 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 6000 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro W6900X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 5,120 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 22.02 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W6900X). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 2150 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 80 (Radeon Pro W6900X) with 576 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,887+3% | 17,413 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608 | 5120+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.31 TFLOPS | 22.02 TFLOPS+35% |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz | 2150 MHz+21% |
| ROPs | 96 | 128+33% |
| TMUs | 288 | 320+11% |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+350% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72 | 80+11% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The Quadro RTX 6000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro W6900X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 6000 has 24 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W6900X carries 32 GB. Radeon Pro W6900X gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro RTX 6000 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro W6900X. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W6900X) — the Quadro RTX 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB | 32 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro W6900X).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 6000 draws 260W versus the Radeon Pro W6900X's 300W — a 14.3% difference. The Quadro RTX 6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 650W (Radeon Pro W6900X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W-13% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 2-50% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 68.8+19% | 58.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro RTX 6000 came in at $6300, while the Radeon Pro W6900X launched at $6000. On MSRP, Radeon Pro W6900X was 4.8% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.8 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 2.9 (Radeon Pro W6900X) — the Radeon Pro W6900X offers 3.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro W6900X (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6300 | $6000-5% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.8 | 2.9+4% |
| Codename | TU102 | Navi 21 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #99 | #101 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro RTX 6000 and Radeon Pro W6900X
