Radeon Pro W6900X vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Radeon Pro W6900X
Popular choices:
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W6900X
Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro W6900X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (32 GB vs 16 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 2000 Ada Generation.
| Insight | Radeon Pro W6900X | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 / 7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $750 versus $5,000 for the Radeon Pro W6900X, it costs 85% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 556.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro W6900X | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+556.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($5,000) | ✅More affordable ($750) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W6900X and RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Radeon Pro W6900X
The Radeon Pro W6900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2150 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,413 points. Launch price was $4,999.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,147 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W6900X scores 17,413 and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation reaches 17,147 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W6900X is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (Radeon Pro W6900X) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 22.02 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W6900X) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2150 MHz vs 2130 MHz. Ray tracing: 80 RT cores (Radeon Pro W6900X) vs 22 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 88.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W6900X | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,413+2% | 17,147 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120+82% | 2816 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.02 TFLOPS+84% | 12 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2150 MHz | 2130 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+167% | 48 |
| TMUs | 320+264% | 88 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 2.8 MB+180% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 80+264% | 22 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro W6900X | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro W6900X comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro W6900X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro W6900X) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W6900X | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+100% | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon Pro W6900X) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W6900X | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro W6900X) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro W6900X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W6900X | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W6900X draws 300W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 124.3% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon Pro W6900X) vs 650W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 167mm, occupying 4 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W6900X | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 70W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 167mm |
| Height | 120mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 4 | 2-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 58.0 | 245.0+322% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro W6900X launched at $6000 MSRP and currently averages $5000, while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation launched at $625 and now averages $750. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation costs 85% less ($4250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.5 (Radeon Pro W6900X) vs 22.9 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation offers 554.3% better value. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W6900X | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6000 | $625-90% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5000 | $750-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.5 | 22.9+554% |
| Codename | Navi 21 | AD107 |
| Release | August 3 2021 | February 12 2024 |
| Ranking | #101 | #107 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro W6900X and RTX 2000 Ada Generation
