
Radeon Pro W6900X

RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Radeon Pro W6900X vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro W6900X vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Pro W6900X vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro W6900X
2021Why buy it
- ✅35.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 16 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌RTX 2000 Ada Generation is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌860% HIGHER MSRP$6,000 MSRPvs$625 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 27.4 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $625 MSRP).
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 300W vs 70W.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,375 less on MSRP ($625 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 845.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.4 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($625 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 300W, a 230W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W6900X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro W6900X vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro W6900X
The Radeon Pro W6900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2150 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,413 points. Launch price was $4,999.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,147 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W6900X scores 17,413 and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation reaches 17,147 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W6900X is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (Radeon Pro W6900X) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 22.02 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W6900X) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2150 MHz vs 2130 MHz. Ray tracing: 80 RT cores (Radeon Pro W6900X) vs 22 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 88.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W6900X | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,413+2% | 17,147 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120+82% | 2816 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.02 TFLOPS+84% | 12 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2150 MHz | 2130 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+167% | 48 |
| TMUs | 320+264% | 88 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 2.8 MB+180% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 80+264% | 22 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro W6900X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W6900X | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro W6900X has 32 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation carries 16 GB. Radeon Pro W6900X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro W6900X and 128-bit on the RTX 2000 Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro W6900X) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W6900X | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+100% | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon Pro W6900X) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W6900X | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro W6900X) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro W6900X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W6900X | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W6900X draws 300W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 124.3% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon Pro W6900X) vs 650W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 167mm, occupying 4 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W6900X | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 70W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 167mm |
| Height | 120mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 4 | 2-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 58.0 | 245.0+322% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon Pro W6900X came in at $6000, while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation launched at $625. On MSRP, RTX 2000 Ada Generation was 89.6% cheaper ($5375 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (Radeon Pro W6900X) vs 27.4 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation offers 844.8% better value. The newer card here is RTX 2000 Ada Generation (2024 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W6900X | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6000 | $625-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.9 | 27.4+845% |
| Codename | Navi 21 | AD107 |
| Release | August 3 2021 | February 12 2024 |
| Ranking | #101 | #107 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














