Radeon PRO W7800 vs GeForce RTX 3090
Radeon PRO W7800
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3090
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7800
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3090
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W7800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (32 GB vs 24 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3090.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7800 | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (312mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3090 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $900 versus $2,200 for the Radeon PRO W7800, it costs 59% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 139.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7800 | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+139.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,200) | ✅More affordable ($900) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7800 and GeForce RTX 3090
Radeon PRO W7800
The Radeon PRO W7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1895 MHz to 2525 MHz. It has 4480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,180 points. Launch price was $2,499.
GeForce RTX 3090
The GeForce RTX 3090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,594 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7800 scores 27,180 and the GeForce RTX 3090 reaches 26,594 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7800 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce RTX 3090 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,480 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 10,496 (GeForce RTX 3090). Raw compute: 45.25 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 35.58 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090). Boost clocks: 2525 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 70 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 82 (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 328.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 27,180+2% | 26,594 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4480 | 10496+134% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 45.25 TFLOPS+27% | 35.58 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2525 MHz+49% | 1695 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+14% | 112 |
| TMUs | 280 | 328+17% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB | 10.3 MB+415% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 70 | 82+17% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7800 comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3090 has 24 GB. The Radeon PRO W7800 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 936 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3090) — a 62.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3090. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+33% | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s | 936 GB/s+63% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3090). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3090). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3090).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7800 draws 260W versus the GeForce RTX 3090's 350W — a 29.5% difference. The Radeon PRO W7800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 750W (GeForce RTX 3090). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 312mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W-26% | 350W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 312mm |
| Height | 111mm | 140mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.5+38% | 76.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7800 launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $2200, while the GeForce RTX 3090 launched at $1499 and now averages $900. The GeForce RTX 3090 costs 59.1% less ($1300 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.4 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 29.5 (GeForce RTX 3090) — the GeForce RTX 3090 offers 137.9% better value. The Radeon PRO W7800 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $1499-40% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2200 | $900-59% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.4 | 29.5+138% |
| Codename | Navi 31 | GA102 |
| Release | April 13 2023 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #28 | #37 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W7800 and GeForce RTX 3090
