CPU
GPU
Radeon PRO W7800
Popular choices:
Radeon AI PRO R9700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7800
Performance Per Dollar Radeon AI PRO R9700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO W7800.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 4.0 (2025) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $1,450 versus $2,200 for the Radeon PRO W7800, it costs 34% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 59.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+59.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,200) | ✅More affordable ($1,450) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7800 and Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon PRO W7800
The Radeon PRO W7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1895 MHz to 2525 MHz. It has 4480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,180 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Radeon AI PRO R9700
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,589 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon PRO W7800 scores 27,180 versus the Radeon AI PRO R9700's 28,589 — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 leads by 5.2%. The Radeon PRO W7800 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 4,480 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 4,096 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Raw compute: 45.25 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Boost clocks: 2525 MHz vs 2920 MHz. Ray tracing: 70 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 64 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 128.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 27,180 | 28,589+5% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 4.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 4480+9% | 4096 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 45.25 TFLOPS | 47.84 TFLOPS+6% |
| Boost Clock | 2525 MHz | 2920 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 128 | 128 |
| TMUs | 280+9% | 256 |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 8 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 70+9% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 32 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 8 MB (Radeon AI PRO R9700) — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 8 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 12.2 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs VCN 5.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 5.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon AI PRO R9700).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 5.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 5.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7800 draws 260W versus the Radeon AI PRO R9700's 300W — a 14.3% difference. The Radeon PRO W7800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 650W (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W-13% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 104.5+10% | 95.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7800 launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $2200, while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 launched at $1299 and now averages $1450. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 costs 34.1% less ($750 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.4 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 19.7 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 offers 58.9% better value. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $1299-48% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2200 | $1450-34% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.4 | 19.7+59% |
| Codename | Navi 31 | Navi 48 |
| Release | April 13 2023 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #28 | #23 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W7800 and Radeon AI PRO R9700
