
Radeon PRO W7800

RTX 4500 Ada Generation
Radeon PRO W7800 vs RTX 4500 Ada Generation Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon PRO W7800 vs RTX 4500 Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon PRO W7800 vs RTX 4500 Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon PRO W7800
2023Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 24 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4500 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌11.1% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$2,250 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ❌23.8% higher power demand at 260W vs 210W.
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅8.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $249 less on MSRP ($2,250 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 13.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 10.9 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 210W instead of 260W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon PRO W7800 vs RTX 4500 Ada Generation Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon PRO W7800
The Radeon PRO W7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1895 MHz to 2525 MHz. It has 4480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,180 points. Launch price was $2,499.

RTX 4500 Ada Generation
The RTX 4500 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2070 MHz to 2580 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,850 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7800 scores 27,180 and the RTX 4500 Ada Generation reaches 27,850 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7800 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX 4500 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,480 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 7,680 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 45.25 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 39.63 TFLOPS (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2525 MHz vs 2580 MHz. Ray tracing: 70 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 60 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) vs 240.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 27,180 | 27,850+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4480 | 7680+71% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 45.25 TFLOPS+14% | 39.63 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2525 MHz | 2580 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 128+60% | 80 |
| TMUs | 280+17% | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB | 7.5 MB+275% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 48 MB+700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 70+17% | 60 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 4500 Ada Generation gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W7800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7800 has 32 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4500 Ada Generation carries 24 GB. Radeon PRO W7800 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 448 GB/s (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) — a 28.6% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7800. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W7800 and 192-bit on the RTX 4500 Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 48 MB (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) — the RTX 4500 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+33% | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s+29% | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 48 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 12.2 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7800 draws 260W versus the RTX 4500 Ada Generation's 210W — a 21.3% difference. The RTX 4500 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 650W (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W | 210W-19% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.5 | 132.6+27% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon PRO W7800 came in at $2499, while the RTX 4500 Ada Generation launched at $2250. On MSRP, RTX 4500 Ada Generation was 10% cheaper ($249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.9 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 12.4 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) — the RTX 4500 Ada Generation offers 13.8% better value.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $2250-10% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.9 | 12.4+14% |
| Codename | Navi 31 | AD103 |
| Release | April 13 2023 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #28 | #27 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














