Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs Radeon PRO W7800

AMD

Radeon AI PRO R9700

2025Core: 1660 MHzBoost: 2920 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
AMD

Radeon PRO W7800

2023Core: 1895 MHzBoost: 2525 MHz
Similar parts
······

Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs Radeon PRO W7800 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs Radeon PRO W7800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs Radeon PRO W7800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon AI PRO R9700

2025

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,200 less on MSRP ($1,299 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 102.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.0 vs 10.9 G3D/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
  • More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 15.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 260W.

Radeon PRO W7800

2023

Why buy it

  • 23.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 260W instead of 300W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 92.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,499 MSRPvs$1,299 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon PRO W7800 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 23.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon AI PRO R9700 instead at 28,589 vs 27,180, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 5nm and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2023. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon AI PRO R9700 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,200 cheaper on MSRP at $1,299 vs $2,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 102.4% (22.0 vs 10.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon PRO W7800 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs Radeon PRO W7800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon AI PRO R9700

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,589 points. Launch price was $1,299.

AMD

Radeon PRO W7800

The Radeon PRO W7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1895 MHz to 2525 MHz. It has 4480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,180 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon AI PRO R9700 scores 28,589 versus the Radeon PRO W7800's 27,180 — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 leads by 5.2%. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is built on RDNA 4.0 while the Radeon PRO W7800 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 4,480 (Radeon PRO W7800). Raw compute: 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 45.25 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7800). Boost clocks: 2920 MHz vs 2525 MHz. Ray tracing: 64 RT cores (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 70 (Radeon PRO W7800) with 128 Tensor cores.

FeatureRadeon AI PRO R9700Radeon PRO W7800
G3D Mark Score
28,589+5%
27,180
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
4 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
4096
4480+9%
Compute (TFLOPS)
47.84 TFLOPS+6%
45.25 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2920 MHz+16%
2525 MHz
ROPs
128
128
TMUs
256
280+9%
L2 Cache
8 MB+33%
6 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR upscaling + RSR
Ray Tracing Cores
64
70+9%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon AI PRO R9700Radeon PRO W7800
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 32 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon AI PRO R9700 and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W7800. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7800) — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon AI PRO R9700Radeon PRO W7800
VRAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
8 MB+33%
6 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon AI PRO R9700Radeon PRO W7800
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 5.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7800). Decoder: VCN 5.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7800).

FeatureRadeon AI PRO R9700Radeon PRO W7800
Encoder
VCN 5.0
VCN 4.0
Decoder
VCN 5.0
VCN 4.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 draws 300W versus the Radeon PRO W7800's 260W — a 14.3% difference. The Radeon PRO W7800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W7800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureRadeon AI PRO R9700Radeon PRO W7800
TDP
300W
260W-13%
Recommended PSU
650W
650W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 8-pin
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
95.3
104.5+10%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon AI PRO R9700 came in at $1299, while the Radeon PRO W7800 launched at $2499. On MSRP, Radeon AI PRO R9700 was 48% cheaper ($1200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 22.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 10.9 (Radeon PRO W7800) — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 offers 101.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon AI PRO R9700 (2025 vs 2023).

FeatureRadeon AI PRO R9700Radeon PRO W7800
MSRP
$1299-48%
$2499
Performance per Dollar
22.0+102%
10.9
Codename
Navi 48
Navi 31
Release
July 23 2025
April 13 2023
Ranking
#23
#28

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.