
GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile vs Radeon AI PRO R9700

GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile
Popular choices:

Radeon AI PRO R9700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile
Performance Per Dollar Radeon AI PRO R9700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (32 GB vs 24 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell (2024−2025) / 4nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 4.0 (2025) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon AI PRO R9700 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile and Radeon AI PRO R9700

GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 990 MHz to 1515 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,280 points.

Radeon AI PRO R9700
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,589 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile scores 28,280 and the Radeon AI PRO R9700 reaches 28,589 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 uses RDNA 4.0, both on a 4 nm process. Shader units: 10,496 (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile) vs 4,096 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Boost clocks: 1515 MHz vs 2920 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 28,280 | 28,589+1% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | RDNA 4.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 10496+156% | 4096 |
| Boost Clock | 1515 MHz | 2920 MHz+93% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 has 32 GB. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB | 32 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile) vs 12.2 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Blackwell) (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile) vs VCN 5.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Decoder: NVDEC (Blackwell) vs VCN 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon AI PRO R9700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Blackwell) | VCN 5.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Blackwell) | VCN 5.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile draws 95W versus the Radeon AI PRO R9700's 300W — a 103.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile) vs 650W (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 95W-68% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 297.7+212% | 95.3 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














