GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile vs Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

#42

Radeon RX 6600S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

173%

#43

Radeon RX 8060S

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

170%

#47

Radeon RX 6700S

MSRP: $479|Avg: $300

167%

#52

Radeon 8060S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

119%

#53

Radeon RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

115%

#54

Radeon RX 6800S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

105%

#56

GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#61

GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)

MSRP: $800|Avg: $350

82%

#62

GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350

80%

#63

RadeonT RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600

74%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

#9

Intel Arc Pro B50

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

105%

#11

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $900|Avg: $300

100%

#16

Radeon PRO W7500

MSRP: $429|Avg: $401

93%

#18

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $340

92%

#19

RTX A2000 12GB

MSRP: $449|Avg: $380

92%

#20

Radeon Pro Vega 56

MSRP: $399|Avg: $60

91%

#21

RTX A2000

MSRP: $450|Avg: $320

90%

#23

Intel Arc Pro B60

MSRP: $500|Avg: $450

83%

#24

Radeon PRO W7600

MSRP: $599|Avg: $599

82%

#25

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $625|Avg: $750

82%

#26

Radeon Pro Vega 48

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

75%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-6%)	✅Leading raw performance (+6%)
Longevity	🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell (2024−2025) / 4nm)	🏆Elite Architecture (Turing (2018−2022) / 12nm)
Ecosystem	✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support	✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (24 GB)	🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile Benchmark Check

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile and Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 990 MHz to 1515 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,280 points.

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,964 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile scores 28,280 versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)'s 29,964 — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) leads by 6%. The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 4 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 10,496 (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile) vs 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1515 MHz vs 1560 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score	28,280	29,964+6%
Architecture	Blackwell 2.0	Turing
Process Node	4 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	10496+310%	2560
Boost Clock	1515 MHz	1560 MHz+3%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	DLSS 3.5
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.0 (Native)
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity	24 GB+200%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile) vs 12.1 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.1
Vulkan	1.4+17%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+300%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Blackwell) (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Decoder: NVDEC (Blackwell) vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)).

Feature	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Encoder	NVENC (Blackwell)	6th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC (Blackwell)	4th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile draws 95W versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)'s 110W — a 14.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
TDP	95W-14%	110W
Recommended PSU	650W	650W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	0mm
Height	0mm	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	85	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	297.7+9%	272.4