Radeon AI PRO R9700
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon AI PRO R9700
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,701 less on MSRP ($1,299 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 190.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.0 vs 7.6 G3D/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 5000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅30.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌207.9% HIGHER MSRP$4,000 MSRPvs$1,299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon AI PRO R9700
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,589 points. Launch price was $1,299.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,269 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon AI PRO R9700 scores 28,589 versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 30,269 — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation leads by 5.9%. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is built on RDNA 4.0 while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2920 MHz vs 2550 MHz. Ray tracing: 64 RT cores (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 100 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) with 128 Tensor cores vs 400.
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 28,589 | 30,269+6% |
| Architecture | RDNA 4.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 | 12800+213% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 47.84 TFLOPS | 65.28 TFLOPS+36% |
| Boost Clock | 2920 MHz+15% | 2550 MHz |
| ROPs | 128 | 176+38% |
| TMUs | 256 | 400+56% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 72 MB+800% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 64 | 100+56% |
| Tensor Cores | 128 | 400+213% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX 5000 Ada Generation gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 4) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 32 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon AI PRO R9700 and 256-bit on the RTX 5000 Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 72 MB+800% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 5.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Decoder: VCN 5.0 vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 5.0 | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | VCN 5.0 | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 draws 300W versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 250W — a 18.2% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 16-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 250W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 16-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 95.3 | 121.1+27% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon AI PRO R9700 came in at $1299, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation launched at $4000. On MSRP, Radeon AI PRO R9700 was 67.5% cheaper ($2701 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 22.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 7.6 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 offers 189.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon AI PRO R9700 (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1299-68% | $4000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.0+189% | 7.6 |
| Codename | Navi 48 | AD102 |
| Release | July 23 2025 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #23 | #16 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon AI PRO R9700 and RTX 5000 Ada Generation
