G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs Radeon PRO W7900 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs Radeon PRO W7900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon AI PRO R9700

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,700 less on MSRP ($1,299 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 212% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.0 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 32 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon PRO W7900

2023

Why buy it

✅34.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 32 GB).

Trade-offs

❌
207.9% HIGHER MSRP
$3,999 MSRPvs$1,299 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon PRO W7900 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 34.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon AI PRO R9700 instead at 28,589 vs 28,211, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 5nm and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2023. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon AI PRO R9700 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,700 cheaper on MSRP at $1,299 vs $3,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 212% (22.0 vs 7.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon PRO W7900 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon AI PRO R9700

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,589 points. Launch price was $1,299.

Radeon PRO W7900

The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 scores 28,589 and the Radeon PRO W7900 reaches 28,211 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is built on RDNA 4.0 while the Radeon PRO W7900 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900). Raw compute: 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900). Boost clocks: 2920 MHz vs 2495 MHz. Ray tracing: 64 RT cores (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 96 (Radeon PRO W7900) with 128 Tensor cores.

Feature	Radeon AI PRO R9700	Radeon PRO W7900
G3D Mark Score	28,589+1%	28,211
Architecture	RDNA 4.0	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	4 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	4096	6144+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)	47.84 TFLOPS	61.32 TFLOPS+28%
Boost Clock	2920 MHz+17%	2495 MHz
ROPs	128	192+50%
TMUs	256	384+50%
L2 Cache	8 MB+33%	6 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling + RSR	FSR upscaling + RSR
Ray Tracing Cores	64	96+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon AI PRO R9700	Radeon PRO W7900
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 has 32 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 carries 48 GB. Radeon PRO W7900 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon AI PRO R9700 and 384-bit on the Radeon PRO W7900. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7900) — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon AI PRO R9700	Radeon PRO W7900
VRAM Capacity	32 GB	48 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	384-bit+50%
L2 Cache	8 MB+33%	6 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon AI PRO R9700	Radeon PRO W7900
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 5.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900). Decoder: VCN 5.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900).

Feature	Radeon AI PRO R9700	Radeon PRO W7900
Encoder	VCN 5.0	VCN 4.0
Decoder	VCN 5.0	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 draws 300W versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 295W — a 1.7% difference. The Radeon PRO W7900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 750W (Radeon PRO W7900). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Radeon AI PRO R9700	Radeon PRO W7900
TDP	300W	295W-2%
Recommended PSU	650W-13%	750W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 8-pin
Length	267mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2-33%	3
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	95.3	95.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon AI PRO R9700 came in at $1299, while the Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999. On MSRP, Radeon AI PRO R9700 was 67.5% cheaper ($2700 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 22.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 7.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 offers 209.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon AI PRO R9700 (2025 vs 2023).

Feature	Radeon AI PRO R9700	Radeon PRO W7900
MSRP	$1299-68%	$3999
Performance per Dollar	22.0+210%	7.1
Codename	Navi 48	Navi 31
Release	July 23 2025	April 13 2023
Ranking	#23	#26

Search Radeon AI PRO R9700 on Amazon

Search Radeon PRO W7900 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.