Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Radeon AI PRO R9700
Popular choices:
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon AI PRO R9700
Performance Per Dollar RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX 6000 Ada Generation offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 4.0 (2025) / 4nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $1,450 versus $5,500 for the RTX 6000 Ada Generation, it costs 74% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 281.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+281.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($1,450) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($5,500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon AI PRO R9700 and RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Radeon AI PRO R9700
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,589 points. Launch price was $1,299.
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,454 points. Launch price was $6,799.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 scores 28,589 and the RTX 6000 Ada Generation reaches 28,454 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is built on RDNA 4.0 while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 18,176 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 91.06 TFLOPS (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2920 MHz vs 2505 MHz. Ray tracing: 64 RT cores (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 142 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) with 128 Tensor cores vs 568.
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 28,589 | 28,454 |
| Architecture | RDNA 4.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 | 18176+344% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 47.84 TFLOPS | 91.06 TFLOPS+90% |
| Boost Clock | 2920 MHz+17% | 2505 MHz |
| ROPs | 128 | 192+50% |
| TMUs | 256 | 568+122% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 96 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 64 | 142+122% |
| Tensor Cores | 128 | 568+344% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation has 48 GB. The RTX 6000 Ada Generation offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 96 MB (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB | 48 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 96 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 12.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 5.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Decoder: VCN 5.0 vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 5.0 | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | VCN 5.0 | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 draws 300W versus the RTX 6000 Ada Generation's 300W — a 0% difference. The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 500W (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 16-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 16-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 95.3 | 94.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 launched at $1299 MSRP and currently averages $1450, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation launched at $6799 and now averages $5500. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 costs 73.6% less ($4050 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.7 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 5.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 offers 278.8% better value. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1299-81% | $6799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1450-74% | $5500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.7+279% | 5.2 |
| Codename | Navi 48 | AD102 |
| Release | July 23 2025 | December 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #23 | #24 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon AI PRO R9700 and RTX 6000 Ada Generation
