
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

Radeon AI PRO R9700
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) vs Radeon AI PRO R9700 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) vs Radeon AI PRO R9700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) vs Radeon AI PRO R9700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $399 less on MSRP ($900 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 51.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.3 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($900 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 300W, a 190W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon AI PRO R9700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
Radeon AI PRO R9700
2025Why buy it
- ✅36.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌44.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,299 MSRPvs$900 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.0 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
- ❌172.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 110W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) vs Radeon AI PRO R9700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,964 points.

Radeon AI PRO R9700
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,589 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) scores 29,964 and the Radeon AI PRO R9700 reaches 28,589 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 4,096 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2920 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 64 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) with 320 Tensor cores vs 128.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 29,964+5% | 28,589 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4096+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.987 TFLOPS | 47.84 TFLOPS+499% |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 2920 MHz+87% |
| ROPs | 64 | 128+100% |
| TMUs | 160 | 256+60% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 64+60% |
| Tensor Cores | 320+150% | 128 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 carries 32 GB. Radeon AI PRO R9700 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) and 256-bit on the Radeon AI PRO R9700. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 8 MB (Radeon AI PRO R9700) — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 32 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 12.2 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs VCN 5.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 5.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon AI PRO R9700).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | VCN 5.0 |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | VCN 5.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) draws 110W versus the Radeon AI PRO R9700's 300W — a 92.7% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 650W (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-63% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 272.4+186% | 95.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) came in at $900, while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 launched at $1299. On MSRP, Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) was 30.7% cheaper ($399 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 33.3 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 22.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) offers 51.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon AI PRO R9700 (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $900-31% | $1299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.3+51% | 22.0 |
| Codename | TU104 | Navi 48 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #201 | #23 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














