Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) vs Radeon AI PRO R9700
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Radeon AI PRO R9700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar Radeon AI PRO R9700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The Radeon AI PRO R9700 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon AI PRO R9700 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Turing (2018−2022) / 12nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 4.0 (2025) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $300 versus $1,450 for the Radeon AI PRO R9700, it costs 79% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 406.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+406.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($300) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,450) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) and Radeon AI PRO R9700
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,964 points.
Radeon AI PRO R9700
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,589 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) scores 29,964 and the Radeon AI PRO R9700 reaches 28,589 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 4,096 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2920 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 64 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) with 320 Tensor cores vs 128.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 29,964+5% | 28,589 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4096+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.987 TFLOPS | 47.84 TFLOPS+499% |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 2920 MHz+87% |
| ROPs | 64 | 128+100% |
| TMUs | 160 | 256+60% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 64+60% |
| Tensor Cores | 320+150% | 128 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 has 32 GB. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 8 MB (Radeon AI PRO R9700) — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 32 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 12.2 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs VCN 5.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 5.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon AI PRO R9700).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | VCN 5.0 |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | VCN 5.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) draws 110W versus the Radeon AI PRO R9700's 300W — a 92.7% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 650W (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-63% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 272.4+186% | 95.3 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) launched at $900 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 launched at $1299 and now averages $1450. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) costs 79.3% less ($1150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 99.9 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 19.7 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) offers 407.1% better value. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $900-31% | $1299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300-79% | $1450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 99.9+407% | 19.7 |
| Codename | TU104 | Navi 48 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #201 | #23 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) and Radeon AI PRO R9700
