
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) vs Radeon RX 7900 XTX Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) vs Radeon RX 7900 XTX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) vs Radeon RX 7900 XTX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($900 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 355W, a 245W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900 XTX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Radeon RX 7900 XTX is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
2022Why buy it
- ✅85.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌11% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$900 MSRP
- ❌222.7% higher power demand at 355W vs 110W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) vs Radeon RX 7900 XTX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,964 points.

Radeon RX 7900 XTX
The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 3 2022. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1929 MHz to 2498 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 355W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,285 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) scores 29,964 and the Radeon RX 7900 XTX reaches 31,285 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 6,144 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 61.39 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2498 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 96 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) with 320 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 29,964 | 31,285+4% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 6144+140% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.987 TFLOPS | 61.39 TFLOPS+669% |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 2498 MHz+60% |
| ROPs | 64 | 192+200% |
| TMUs | 160 | 384+140% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 3 MB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 96+140% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation, but they get there through different ecosystems. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can help smooth out supported games, but they are not on the same feature stack.The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 7900 XTX leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX carries 24 GB. Radeon RX 7900 XTX gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) and 384-bit on the Radeon RX 7900 XTX. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) — the Radeon RX 7900 XTX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs AMD Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs AMD Dual Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | AMD Dual Media Engine |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | AMD Dual Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) draws 110W versus the Radeon RX 7900 XTX's 355W — a 105.4% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 800W (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 287mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 68°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-69% | 355W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-19% | 800W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 287mm |
| Height | 0mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 68°C-9% |
| Perf/Watt | 272.4+209% | 88.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) came in at $900, while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX launched at $999. On MSRP, Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) was 9.9% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 33.3 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 31.3 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) offers 6.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 7900 XTX (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $900-10% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.3+6% | 31.3 |
| Codename | TU104 | Navi 31 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | November 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #201 | #12 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














