
GeForce RTX 5090 D v2

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 vs Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 vs Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 vs Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 5090 D v2
2025Why buy it
- ✅104.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅112.5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (680 vs 320).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌122.1% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$900 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.2 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
- ❌422.7% higher power demand at 575W vs 110W.
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,099 less on MSRP ($900 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 118.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.3 vs 15.2 G3D/$ ($900 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 575W, a 465W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (320 vs 680), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 vs Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 5090 D v2
The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 15 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,399 points. Launch price was $2,299.

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,964 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 scores 30,399 and the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) reaches 29,964 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) vs 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 170 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) vs 40 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) with 680 Tensor cores vs 320.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 30,399+1% | 29,964 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 21760+750% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 TFLOPS+1212% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2407 MHz+54% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+175% | 64 |
| TMUs | 680+325% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 21.3 MB+752% | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+2300% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 170+325% | 40 |
| Tensor Cores | 680+113% | 320 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 is on the newer stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) stays on DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14% | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4)+14% | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 has 32 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 512-bit on the GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 and 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel). L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) — the GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+300% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 512-bit+100% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+2300% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) vs 12.1 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Decoder: NVDEC (6th Gen) vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (9th Gen) | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (6th Gen) | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 draws 575W versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)'s 110W — a 135.8% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1000W (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Power connectors: 16-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 575W | 110W-81% |
| Recommended PSU | 1000W | 650W-35% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 0mm |
| Height | 137mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 52.9 | 272.4+415% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 came in at $1999, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) launched at $900. On MSRP, Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) was 55% cheaper ($1099 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.2 (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) vs 33.3 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) offers 119.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $900-55% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.2 | 33.3+119% |
| Codename | GB202 | TU104 |
| Release | August 15 2025 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #15 | #201 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














