
GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 5090 D v2
Popular choices:

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5090 D v2
Performance Per Dollar RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 5000 Ada Generation.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (304mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $4,086.44 versus $4,095 for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation, it costs 0% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 0.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($4,086.44) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($4,095) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 and RTX 5000 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 5090 D v2
The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 15 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,399 points. Launch price was $2,299.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,269 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 scores 30,399 and the RTX 5000 Ada Generation reaches 30,269 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) vs 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) vs 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 2550 MHz. Ray tracing: 170 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) vs 100 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) with 680 Tensor cores vs 400.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 30,399 | 30,269 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 21760+70% | 12800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 TFLOPS+61% | 65.28 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2407 MHz | 2550 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 176 | 176 |
| TMUs | 680+70% | 400 |
| L1 Cache | 21.3 MB+70% | 12.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+33% | 72 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 170+70% | 100 |
| Tensor Cores | 680+70% | 400 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 32 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 1792 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) vs 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — a 211.1% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5090 D v2. Bus width: 512-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) vs 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1792 GB/s+211% | 576 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 512-bit+100% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+33% | 72 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC (6th Gen) vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (9th Gen) | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (6th Gen) | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 draws 575W versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 250W — a 78.8% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1000W (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) vs 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 304mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 575W | 250W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 1000W | 650W-35% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 304mm | 267mm |
| Height | 137mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 52.9 | 121.1+129% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 launched at $1999 MSRP and currently averages $4086.44, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation launched at $4000 and now averages $4095. The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 costs 0.2% less ($9 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.4 (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) vs 7.4 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation offers 0% better value. The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999-50% | $4000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $4086.44 | $4095 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.4 | 7.4 |
| Codename | GB202 | AD102 |
| Release | August 15 2025 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #15 | #16 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











