
GeForce RTX 4090 D vs Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 4090 D
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4090 D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (24 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel).
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4090 D | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Turing (2018−2022) / 12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (304mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $300 versus $1,599 for the GeForce RTX 4090 D, it costs 81% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 419.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4090 D | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+419.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,599) | ✅More affordable ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4090 D and Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 4090 D
The GeForce RTX 4090 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 28 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2280 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 14592 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 425W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 114 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,725 points. Launch price was $1,599.

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,964 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4090 D scores 30,725 and the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) reaches 29,964 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4090 D is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 14,592 (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 73.54 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 114 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 40 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) with 456 Tensor cores vs 320.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 30,725+3% | 29,964 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 14592+470% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 73.54 TFLOPS+821% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz+62% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+175% | 64 |
| TMUs | 456+185% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 14.3 MB+472% | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+1700% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 114+185% | 40 |
| Tensor Cores | 456+43% | 320 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smoothen motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4090 D comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4090 D offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) — the GeForce RTX 4090 D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+200% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+1700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 12.1 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 2x NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 2x NVENC (8th Gen) | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4090 D draws 425W versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)'s 110W — a 117.8% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 850W (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Power connectors: 16-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 0mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 425W | 110W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 850W | 650W-24% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 0mm |
| Height | 137mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 3 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 78°C | 75°C-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 72.3 | 272.4+277% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4090 D launched at $1599 MSRP, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) launched at $900 and now averages $300. The GeForce RTX 4090 D is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1599 | $900-44% |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $300 |
| Codename | AD102 | TU104 |
| Release | December 28 2023 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #14 | #201 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















