
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) vs RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) vs RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) vs RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,099 less on MSRP ($900 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 652.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.3 vs 4.4 G3D/$ ($900 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 300W, a 190W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (320 vs 440), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅98.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅37.5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (440 vs 320).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌677.7% HIGHER MSRP$6,999 MSRPvs$900 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.4 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
- ❌172.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 110W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) vs RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,964 points.

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 2377 MHz. It has 14080 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 110 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,968 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) scores 29,964 and the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell reaches 30,968 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 14,080 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 66.94 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2377 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 110 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) with 320 Tensor cores vs 440.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 29,964 | 30,968+3% |
| Architecture | Turing | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 14080+450% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.987 TFLOPS | 66.94 TFLOPS+738% |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 2377 MHz+52% |
| ROPs | 64 | 176+175% |
| TMUs | 160 | 440+175% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 13.8 MB+452% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 96 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 110+175% |
| Tensor Cores | 320 | 440+38% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell carries 48 GB. RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) and 384-bit on the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 96 MB (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 48 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 96 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs NVENC (9th Gen) (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (6th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | NVENC (9th Gen) |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (6th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) draws 110W versus the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell's 300W — a 92.7% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 650W (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-63% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 272.4+164% | 103.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) came in at $900, while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell launched at $6999. On MSRP, Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) was 87.1% cheaper ($6099 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 33.3 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 4.4 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) offers 656.8% better value. The newer card here is RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $900-87% | $6999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.3+657% | 4.4 |
| Codename | TU104 | GB202 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #201 | #13 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














