Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) vs RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.4% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (48 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel).
| Insight | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Turing (2018−2022) / 12nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $300 versus $4,799 for the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, it costs 94% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 1447.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1447.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($300) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($4,799) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,964 points.
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 2377 MHz. It has 14080 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 110 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,968 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) scores 29,964 and the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell reaches 30,968 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 14,080 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 66.94 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2377 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 110 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) with 320 Tensor cores vs 440.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 29,964 | 30,968+3% |
| Architecture | Turing | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 14080+450% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.987 TFLOPS | 66.94 TFLOPS+738% |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 2377 MHz+52% |
| ROPs | 64 | 176+175% |
| TMUs | 160 | 440+175% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 13.8 MB+452% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 96 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 110+175% |
| Tensor Cores | 320 | 440+38% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell has 48 GB. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 96 MB (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 48 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 96 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs NVENC (9th Gen) (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (6th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | NVENC (9th Gen) |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (6th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) draws 110W versus the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell's 300W — a 92.7% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 650W (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-63% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 272.4+164% | 103.2 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) launched at $900 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell launched at $6999 and now averages $4799. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) costs 93.7% less ($4499 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 99.9 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 6.5 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) offers 1436.9% better value. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $900-87% | $6999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300-94% | $4799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 99.9+1437% | 6.5 |
| Codename | TU104 | GB202 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #201 | #13 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
