Radeon PRO W7800 vs GeForce RTX 4060
Radeon PRO W7800
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7800
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W7800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 39% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (32 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 4060.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7800 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+39%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-39%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $299 versus $2,200 for the Radeon PRO W7800, it costs 86% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 429.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7800 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+429.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,200) | ✅More affordable ($299) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7800 and GeForce RTX 4060
Radeon PRO W7800
The Radeon PRO W7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1895 MHz to 2525 MHz. It has 4480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,180 points. Launch price was $2,499.
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon PRO W7800 scores 27,180 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the Radeon PRO W7800 leads by 39%. The Radeon PRO W7800 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,480 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 45.25 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 2525 MHz vs 2460 MHz. Ray tracing: 70 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 24 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 96.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 27,180+39% | 19,548 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4480+46% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 45.25 TFLOPS+199% | 15.11 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2525 MHz+3% | 2460 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+167% | 48 |
| TMUs | 280+192% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 24 MB+300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 70+192% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7800 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7800 comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO W7800 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) — a 111.8% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7800. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+300% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s+112% | 272 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 24 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7800 draws 260W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 77.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 73°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W | 115W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 550W-15% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 73°C-9% |
| Perf/Watt | 104.5 | 170.0+63% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7800 launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $2200, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 and now averages $299. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 86.4% less ($1901 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.4 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 427.4% better value.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $299-88% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2200 | $299-86% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.4 | 65.4+427% |
| Codename | Navi 31 | AD107 |
| Release | April 13 2023 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #28 | #84 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W7800 and GeForce RTX 4060
