
Radeon Pro WX 7100

Radeon RX 5300
Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs Radeon RX 5300 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs Radeon RX 5300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs Radeon RX 5300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro WX 7100
2016Why buy it
- ✅52.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 3 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌519.4% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 59.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌30% higher power demand at 130W vs 100W.
Radeon RX 5300
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $670 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 511.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 59.0 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 130W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 7100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs Radeon RX 5300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro WX 7100
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,701 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon RX 5300
The Radeon RX 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,606 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 scores 7,701 and the Radeon RX 5300 reaches 7,606 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 5300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5300). Raw compute: 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5300). Boost clocks: 1243 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,701+1% | 7,606 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+64% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.728 TFLOPS+24% | 4.632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1243 MHz | 1645 MHz+32% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+64% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 5300 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5300 carries 3 GB. Radeon Pro WX 7100 gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 7100 and 96-bit on the Radeon RX 5300. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon RX 5300) — the Radeon Pro WX 7100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+167% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+33% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5300). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5300). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 5300).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 5300's 100W — a 26.1% difference. The Radeon RX 5300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 180mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 100W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 180mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 59.2 | 76.1+29% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon Pro WX 7100 came in at $799, while the Radeon RX 5300 launched at $129. On MSRP, Radeon RX 5300 was 83.9% cheaper ($670 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.6 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 59.0 (Radeon RX 5300) — the Radeon RX 5300 offers 514.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 5300 (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $129-84% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.6 | 59.0+515% |
| Codename | Ellesmere | Navi 14 |
| Release | November 10 2016 | May 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #331 | #336 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














