
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon Pro WX 7100

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 7100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is positioned at rank 316 and the Radeon Pro WX 7100 is on rank 144, so the Radeon Pro WX 7100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 7100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 7100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and Radeon Pro WX 7100

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1185 MHz to 1477 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,717 points.

Radeon Pro WX 7100
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,701 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile scores 7,717 and the Radeon Pro WX 7100 reaches 7,701 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Raw compute: 6.05 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Boost clocks: 1477 MHz vs 1243 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,717 | 7,701 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2304+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.05 TFLOPS+6% | 5.728 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1477 MHz+19% | 1243 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 144+125% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+346% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7100).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP11 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile draws 45W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7100's 130W — a 97.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-65% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 171.5+190% | 59.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $180 |
| Codename | GA107 | Ellesmere |
| Release | December 17 2021 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #349 | #331 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















