GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Radeon Pro WX 7100
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon Pro WX 7100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 130W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 7100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Radeon Pro WX 7100
2016Why buy it
- ✅24.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌188.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1185 MHz to 1477 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,717 points.
Radeon Pro WX 7100
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,701 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile scores 7,717 and the Radeon Pro WX 7100 reaches 7,701 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Raw compute: 6.05 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Boost clocks: 1477 MHz vs 1243 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,717 | 7,701 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2304+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.05 TFLOPS+6% | 5.728 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1477 MHz+19% | 1243 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 144+125% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+346% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro WX 7100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 7100.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7100).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP11 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile draws 45W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7100's 130W — a 97.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-65% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 171.5+190% | 59.2 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $799 |
| Codename | GA107 | Ellesmere |
| Release | December 17 2021 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #349 | #331 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and Radeon Pro WX 7100
