GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Radeon RX 6400
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon RX 6400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon RX 6400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon RX 6400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅25.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 53W, a 8W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 48.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
Radeon RX 6400
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌17.8% higher power demand at 53W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon RX 6400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1185 MHz to 1477 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,717 points.
Radeon RX 6400
The Radeon RX 6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1923 MHz to 2321 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 53W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,728 points. Launch price was $159.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile scores 7,717 and the Radeon RX 6400 reaches 7,728 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6400 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6400). Raw compute: 6.05 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 3.565 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6400). Boost clocks: 1477 MHz vs 2321 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 12 (Radeon RX 6400) with 256 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,717 | 7,728 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+167% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.05 TFLOPS+70% | 3.565 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1477 MHz | 2321 MHz+57% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64+33% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+900% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32+167% | 12 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6400 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 6400 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 128 GB/s (Radeon RX 6400) — a 14.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 6400. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and 64-bit on the Radeon RX 6400. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6400) — the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 128 GB/s+14% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6400). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs None (Radeon RX 6400). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs VCN 3.0 (Limited). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6400).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8.0 | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP11 | VCN 3.0 (Limited) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile draws 45W versus the Radeon RX 6400's 53W — a 16.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6400). Power connectors: Mobile vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 172mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-15% | 53W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | None |
| Length | 0mm | 172mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 171.5+18% | 145.8 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon RX 6400 (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $159 |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 24 |
| Release | December 17 2021 | January 19 2022 |
| Ranking | #349 | #330 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and Radeon RX 6400
