GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon Pro 580

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

2021Core: 1185 MHzBoost: 1477 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 580

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon Pro 580 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon Pro 580 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon Pro 580: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

2021

Why buy it

  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 580 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Radeon Pro 580

2017

Why buy it

  • 4.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
  • 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro 580 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (7,753 vs 7,717), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 14nm, 32 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2017. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro 580 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro 580 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon Pro 580 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1185 MHz to 1477 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,717 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro 580

The Radeon Pro 580 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,753 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile scores 7,717 and the Radeon Pro 580 reaches 7,753 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro 580 uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580). Raw compute: 6.05 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 580). Boost clocks: 1477 MHz vs 1200 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050 MobileRadeon Pro 580
G3D Mark Score
7,717
7,753
Architecture
Ampere
GCN 4.0
Process Node
8 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2048
2304+13%
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.05 TFLOPS+9%
5.53 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1477 MHz+23%
1200 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64
144+125%
L1 Cache
2.5 MB+346%
0.56 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 580 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050 MobileRadeon Pro 580
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 580.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050 MobileRadeon Pro 580
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050 MobileRadeon Pro 580
DirectX
12.2+2%
12.0
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580).

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050 MobileRadeon Pro 580
Encoder
NVENC 8.0
VCE 3.4
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP11
UVD 6.3
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile draws 45W versus the Radeon Pro 580's 150W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 580). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050 MobileRadeon Pro 580
TDP
45W-70%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
171.5+232%
51.7
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (2021 vs 2017).

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050 MobileRadeon Pro 580
MSRP
$500
Codename
GA107
Polaris 20
Release
December 17 2021
June 5 2017
Ranking
#349
#327

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.