GeForce RTX 2050 vs GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 2050

#31

Radeon RX 7400

MSRP: $199|Avg: $199

114%

#32

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

113%

#33

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

112%

#34

Radeon RX 5300

MSRP: $129|Avg: $50

109%

#35

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

MSRP: $150|Avg: $77

108%

#36

Radeon RX 6400

MSRP: $159|Avg: $139

108%

#37

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

MSRP: $599|Avg: $330

108%

#38

Arc A750

MSRP: $289|Avg: $229

107%

#39

Radeon RX 6800

MSRP: $579|Avg: $370

106%

#40

GeForce RTX 3060 8GB

MSRP: $329|Avg: $280

106%

#41

Radeon RX 6750 XT

MSRP: $549|Avg: $320

105%

#42

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

MSRP: $799|Avg: $590

104%

#43

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB

MSRP: $429|Avg: $429

103%

#44

GeForce RTX 5070

MSRP: $549|Avg: $550

102%

#45

Radeon RX 7600 XT

MSRP: $329|Avg: $330

102%

#46

GeForce RTX 2050

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

100%

#47

GeForce RTX 3080

MSRP: $699|Avg: $400

100%

#48

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

MSRP: $499|Avg: $449

98%

#49

Radeon RX 7900 GRE

MSRP: $549|Avg: $540

98%

#50

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

MSRP: $599|Avg: $600

97%

#51

Radeon RX 7800 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $490

96%

#52

GeForce RTX 3060 12GB

MSRP: $329|Avg: $340

96%

#53

GeForce RTX 4070

MSRP: $599|Avg: $550

95%

#54

Radeon RX 7650 GRE

MSRP: $279|Avg: $380

95%

#55

GeForce RTX 2060 12GB

MSRP: $470|Avg: $120

94%

#56

Arc A770

MSRP: $349|Avg: $280

93%

#57

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB

MSRP: $289|Avg: $423

92%

#58

Arc A380

MSRP: $149|Avg: $119

91%

#59

Radeon RX 9070

MSRP: $549|Avg: $550

90%

#60

Radeon RX 7900 XT

MSRP: $899|Avg: $630

90%

#61

GeForce RTX 4080

MSRP: $1199|Avg: $800

80%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

#63

RadeonT RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600

100%

#306

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

774%

#308

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

701%

#309

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

700%

#313

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

636%

#314

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

632%

#316

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#321

GeForce 940A

MSRP: $80|Avg: $80

99%

#323

Radeon RX 640

MSRP: $159|Avg: $55

97%

#326

Iris Pro Graphics P580

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

96%

#327

Radeon E8870PCIe

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

96%

#330

Arc Graphics 140T

MSRP: $350|Avg: $300

92%

#331

Radeon 680M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 2050.

Insight	GeForce RTX 2050	GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022))	🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
Ecosystem	✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support	✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 2050 Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2050 and GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

GeForce RTX 2050

The GeForce RTX 2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,714 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1185 MHz to 1477 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,717 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 2050 scores 7,714 and the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile reaches 7,717 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2050 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 2,048 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 6.05 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1477 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 32 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) with 368 Tensor cores vs 256.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2050	GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
G3D Mark Score	7,714	7,717
Architecture	Turing	Ampere
Process Node	12 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	2944+44%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	10.07 TFLOPS+66%	6.05 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1710 MHz+16%	1477 MHz
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	184+188%	64
L1 Cache	2.9 MB+16%	2.5 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	46+44%	32
Tensor Cores	368+44%	256

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce RTX 2050	GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2.0	DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation	FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)	FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 2050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2050	GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	112 GB/s	112 GB/s
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2050	GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs PureVideo HD VP11. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2050	GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Encoder	NVENC 8.0	NVENC 8.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP11	PureVideo HD VP11
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2050 draws 215W versus the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile's 45W — a 130.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 350W (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile). Power connectors: 6-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.