GeForce RTX 2050
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
GeForce RTX 2050 vs Radeon Pro 5500 XT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2050 vs Radeon Pro 5500 XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2050 vs Radeon Pro 5500 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2050
2018Why buy it
- ✅72.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 29.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.4 vs 39.7 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌72% higher power demand at 215W vs 125W.
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 215W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2050 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌32.7% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.7 vs 51.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2050 vs Radeon Pro 5500 XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 2050
The GeForce RTX 2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,714 points. Launch price was $699.
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,910 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2050 scores 7,714 and the Radeon Pro 5500 XT reaches 7,910 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2050 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro 5500 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1757 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,714 | 7,910+3% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2944+92% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.07 TFLOPS+87% | 5.398 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz | 1757 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 184+92% | 96 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2050 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce RTX 2050 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5500 XT. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) — the GeForce RTX 2050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP11 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2050 draws 215W versus the Radeon Pro 5500 XT's 125W — a 52.9% difference. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 215W | 125W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 35.9 | 63.3+76% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 2050 came in at $150, while the Radeon Pro 5500 XT launched at $199. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 2050 was 24.6% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.4 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 39.7 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) — the GeForce RTX 2050 offers 29.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 5500 XT (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-25% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.4+29% | 39.7 |
| Codename | TU104 | Navi 14 |
| Release | September 20 2018 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #94 | #322 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 2050 and Radeon Pro 5500 XT
