GeForce RTX 2050 vs Radeon RX 6400

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2050

2018Core: 1515 MHzBoost: 1710 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 6400

2022Core: 1923 MHzBoost: 2321 MHz
RX family
·······

GeForce RTX 2050 vs Radeon RX 6400 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 2050 vs Radeon RX 6400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 2050 vs Radeon RX 6400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 2050

2018

Why buy it

  • 82.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $9 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 305.7% higher power demand at 215W vs 53W.

Radeon RX 6400

2022

Why buy it

  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 53W instead of 215W, a 162W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2050 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
  • 6% HIGHER MSRP
    $159 MSRPvs$150 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 2050 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 82.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon RX 6400 instead at 7,728 vs 7,714, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 6400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR 3 (2023) and FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while GeForce RTX 2050 is limited to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) and no comparable frame-generation support, a 6nm process instead of 12nm, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2018. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2050 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $9 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $159, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 5.8% (51.4 vs 48.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce RTX 2050 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon RX 6400 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce RTX 2050 vs Radeon RX 6400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2050

The GeForce RTX 2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,714 points. Launch price was $699.

AMD

Radeon RX 6400

The Radeon RX 6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1923 MHz to 2321 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 53W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,728 points. Launch price was $159.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 2050 scores 7,714 and the Radeon RX 6400 reaches 7,728 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2050 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 6400 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6400). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 3.565 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6400). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 2321 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 12 (Radeon RX 6400) with 368 Tensor cores.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050Radeon RX 6400
G3D Mark Score
7,714
7,728
Architecture
Turing
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
12 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
2944+283%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
10.07 TFLOPS+182%
3.565 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
2321 MHz+36%
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
184+283%
48
L1 Cache
2.9 MB+1060%
0.25 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
46+283%
12

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6400 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce RTX 2050 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 2050 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 6400 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050Radeon RX 6400
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
FSR 3
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 128 GB/s (Radeon RX 6400) — a 14.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 6400. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce RTX 2050 and 64-bit on the Radeon RX 6400. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6400) — the GeForce RTX 2050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050Radeon RX 6400
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
128 GB/s+14%
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6400). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050Radeon RX 6400
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs None (Radeon RX 6400). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs VCN 3.0 (Limited). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6400).

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050Radeon RX 6400
Encoder
NVENC 8.0
None
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP11
VCN 3.0 (Limited)
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2050 draws 215W versus the Radeon RX 6400's 53W — a 120.9% difference. The Radeon RX 6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6400). Power connectors: 6-pin vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 172mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050Radeon RX 6400
TDP
215W
53W-75%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
6-pin
None
Length
0mm
172mm
Height
0mm
112mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
35.9
145.8+306%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 2050 came in at $150, while the Radeon RX 6400 launched at $159. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 2050 was 5.7% cheaper ($9 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.4 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 48.6 (Radeon RX 6400) — the GeForce RTX 2050 offers 5.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 6400 (2022 vs 2018).

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050Radeon RX 6400
MSRP
$150-6%
$159
Performance per Dollar
51.4+6%
48.6
Codename
TU104
Navi 24
Release
September 20 2018
January 19 2022
Ranking
#94
#330

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.